Momotaro 69

The Limited Edition Of Crazyman In The World !

Girl Just changing upper part shirt= Outrage, yet Guy Even changing bottom part jeans= normal day, Hypocrisy by Asia feminine feminist & Religious society.

So Asian Religious society ( + Feminine feminist domination) is making double standard dresscode more contrast everywhere they go. Once I playing futsal with my religious friend, then some of them started changing jeans at public, and I ask myself this is a country (& more over my friend is from religious background) who often whining telling a – clothed – female to be more modest even over just a cleavage/ leg, which mean society will more outrage if female changing upper part shirt leaving bikini top only right? yet the guy can even exposed his bottom part underwear (Bottom part > upper part). When I ask the cliche reply is “we still not naked”- true but female changing shirt is still more modest than you changing bottom part jeans but somehow a female who change upper part shirt publicly is count as “inappropriate” even if she’s not naked. Second cliche he gave “This is all male”- err no many female too. I’m not here telling to be modest or immodest, I just point out doublestandard that create by religious bigot + feminine hypocrite feminist, I want euality like at Europe/ Latin- anatomy equality dresscode at public, not like Asia.  Share my message.

IMG_20180605_143335

IMG_20180717_173117

Advertisements
Leave a comment »

Croc (Crop) Tops For Men, and Gotopless 2018, Free The Nipple!

Majority of people problematic over crop top (debate on youtube) because they think it “against Masculism”, or “too feminine”, and some feminine / sex negative feminist girl are afraid they couldn’t see male nipple for free anymore, and get real equality, Lol.

I don’t really bother by crop top- if some dude want to wear it (for whatever reason), it’s their rights, and it it’s not like every men will not topless anymore- so don’t panic ladies 😉 .. yeah okay “female never attracted to shirtless men”- yet panic on internet trying to make sure men for showing his nipple.

Also they – the one who complain – is the one who often said “people hv rights to express their view, don’t forced your mindset, we don’t care what you feel” yet alone get triggered & trying to forced their mindset.

I as a supporter of topless equality don’t hv any problem with it- it even give senses of topless fairness.

Now, today is gotopless 2018 day, I support, why men can fully shirtless (at their upper part) yet female couldn’t, why need to slut shame female only- if both sexes topless at public? Why female can see men nip & not curious anymore yet men couldn’t + count “sexist” if see it (breast)?

Breast isn’t genital, both genital of male & female – penis & VAGINA – already have same standard being covered equally so should not be problem (here we talking about upper ‘non-genital’ part).

In the past bikini is very scandalized at public (victorian era I think) but now? No big deal, the same to free the nipple, some Europe place & some topless fest including Gotopless day at West already show it possible.

Female also have brain they will only topless at place that allowed free the nipple, during day at crowded place (which increase safety)- they’ll not do it at unknown street at dark/ night.

And no, we don’t forced all female, only body confidence female who want to topless in non sex context.

Why mainstream problematic if men & women can see each other topless equally at public? (which actually fair), yet they fine even laugh when ‘female can see men fully naked, while guy couldn’t even see female ½ naked at public fest’? – (which actually unfair to men, maybe female too from differ perspective), I know this because I observed it several time on every ‘male public nude fest’- yes it exist (so feminine feminist’s claim “only happen to women”= WRONG.

Support body confidence aka SEX POSITIVE FEMINIST since they’re fair! Free The Nipple!  Free The Vagina!

Share to offend them- Feminine ‘sex negative’ feminist girl!

Debunking FreeThePenis Biased Free The V2

I Support GOTOPLESS 2018 27818 (1)

I Support GOTOPLESS 2018 27818 (2)

 

Leave a comment »

Breastfeed video anger Asian feminine feminist female & Gotopless 2018 support

2 quick issues I want to mentioned:

First just about a day ago I found a youtube video about Asian momy record herself for breastfeeding, it seem this mommy bit confidence when breastfeeding her kid (or just seem like that because the baby not realize where’s the mum’s nipple), and other thing is maybe because this women’s breast is “above avarage”. So by this it outrage a sex negative feminist, or feminine feminist, here’s one of the comment (to be fair there’s other people comment who encourage breastfeeding too).

Screenshot_2018-08-09-03-14-25

She get’s many like, and support reply for her negative comment..so to people with this kind of mentality.

My problem with ‘pooja’ comment is, Why we must outrage so much? Her main purpose is still for motherhood not for “porn”- yes  maybe the breast above avarage which make some ‘feminine female’ see that as “porn”, but that shouldn’t be the justification that ‘showing video of breastfeed were nipple sometime can be seen’ as something “bad”, no it’s Not. It same like when men topless in video & out of scenario he bit show off his chest muscle, nothing need to be blame right? Same like that.

“O she upload it, and showing her nipple, she must not do that!” , what’s rights do you have to tell her what to do, and what not to do? This mum’s purpose is for showing breastfeeding even if bit of her show off nipple- So What? This feminine feminist seem try to make a body confidence female look “bad”, I said nothing wrong for female to have body confidence (maybe there’s other female who like modesty- that girl can be a modest girl but what I dislike is when they try to forced, and shame other girl who are opposite from them).

Male shirtless all the time, male nipple are all over the internet, even exposed at public all the time, some men do it for trying to gain attention “Look at my macho buff chest, and my six pack” yet this feminine female have no problem with it- yeah they like it ;), yet really outrage if 1-2 woman show nip when breastfeed indoor at internet? That’s called double standard & hypocrisy feminine ladies!

She said that mum must show it only for her husband? Is this hypocrisy again? feminine female also have no problem to share pic of their husband topless, or if her husband show his topless muscle at public for other female to see.

By her name it seem she is an Indian, an Asian as usual..I don’t want to be racist since I’m Asian too. But let be honest Asian mindset is often very not fair: they can outrage over just a ½ naked women (topless) seen by men like this video (where remember that female can see topless male too at other video right?- equal actually), but act like a normal day if it a male who even full naked (topless + bottomless) seen by female at public- like in India itself for instant they have that Holy Gangga bath festival .. men even just see full clothed women there (female not even ½ naked, which still unfair if female just ½ naked because bottomless male=bottomless female), yet female not only can see men topless, or with underwear but free to see penis + men buttcrack- contrast right? yet no outrage from feminine female, some even try to defend it..That’s why I’m an Asian who upset with Asian mentality.

BIEBER VS TOPLESS EQUALITY 14818

Move on Gotopless day will be held in 26s August 2018 all over the West and that excited me, Topless female at public in non sexual context should be often I think in order to normalize it, but this festival still a good momentum to raise awareness. Am I hypocrite? No because female itself can see topless male all the time- release her curiosity on male toplessness, free to express herself if she attracted with hot shirtless actor, so nothing wrong if male can see topless female in non sexual context at public.

Other thing is penis=VAGINA (both primary reproduction, genital, between legs, and for peeing), when I said “if female can see men topless, then male must able to see female vagina”- mainstream easily understood that it’s wrong comparison right? So how come suddenly they “forgot” if the situation were reverse? ½ naked female doesn’t equal with full naked men (nipple=nipple, while penis=VAGINA).

When I said ‘in non sexual context’ it means like at Europe, men see topless female at public, and yes male can still attracted (or even get boner) but he know the right context just walk and pass by (even sometime not give a bait), and not “crazily obsessed because never see it”..nothing wrong for guy admiring female topless since female also already free to admire topless men (some female do attracted to shirtless male, and if they seem “not attracted” because men topless all the time very often make her ‘bored’).

Possible look at Europe (yes not all place, not in the office but they have female topless in non sexual context far more often to happen at public/ art + more acceptable there).

GOTOPLESS 2018 ! YOU GET MY SUPPORT for TRUE EQUALITY

*I hv spoke here how topless equality possible, and give fairness to both gender. Share my quick article in order to celebrate Gotopless’18… help the org grow!

IMG_20180701_215944

 

Leave a comment »

Free The Nipple Family Animation, Finally! Have some Topless Equality.

I remember in my younger age, I get shock when in the mainstream were even to make animation of female (non genital) nipple is already considered very taboo, couldn’t family rating & “degrade female” – that politically correctness culture claim – yet there’s a people who even easily make animation short story that display male genital a.k.a penis (if you don’t get it: 1/2 female nudity animation can be considered more taboo than male full frontal animation), so funny if I couldn’t imagine family animation can show half female nudity without mainstream (especially feminist) get mad, yet there’s a fucking family animation that easily show penis/ male full nudity, isn’t it unfair? (that’s animation story about david statue which piss me off & I already ‘protest’ by the way).

But finally I found an animation that show female nipple + female buttcrack – although not yet show vagina, the equivalent of dick – this still a good positive step for nudity equality, I hope people can more be fair, free thinker, and don’t get trap by pc culture, sex negative feminist mentality, or even religion mindset.. just because majority of people think “okay” to apply inequality in nudity doesn’t mean they are “right”, speak up our mind (even if just in social media) that we want genital equality, or at very least both censored fairly.

I even remember seeing newspaper were journalist took a photos with tribe couple – the men almost naked show his ball, the female already more modest have skirt – yet the journalist censored only (non genital) breast while display balls..it happen when I travel in some South Asia, unfortunately I forgot to capture that unfair censorship photos- but you can use lie detector to me.

480p - (6) CGI Animated Short Film HD Goutte d_Or Short Film by Happy Flyfish - YouTube.mkv_000349280

480p - (6) CGI Animated Short Film HD Goutte d_Or Short Film by Happy Flyfish - YouTube.mkv_000430120

SHARE IF YOU WANT TO HELP RAISE AWARENESS OF EQUALITY, PENIS= VAGINA (NOT ANYTHING ELSE). IF YOU KNOW WHO CREATE THIS SAY MY THANKS TO THEM, AND HOPEFULLY IN FUTURE THEY SHOW NON SEXUAL VULVA ANIMATION.

Leave a comment »

Naked Riot in Berkeley City Court

Story were nudity equality group try to achieved nudity freedom in court of Berkeley but the sex negative feminist judge – sophie hahn- create a strawman argument by pointing ‘freethenipple’ movement and questioning “Ah doublestandard why objectifiying women bodies only? why not men”, so my answer is 1) the topic is not free the nipple but ‘nudity’, 2) if about topless equality – the men side already free to topless (to be seen by you sophie hahn) in the first place that’s why ‘freethenipple’ movement ask for ‘women only’ to be topless fairly like men side, 3) don’t said you compared breast (non genital private) with penis (male genital) – it’s biased to compared half naked female with full naked male, how if I reverse? I said “you only talk about how men can shirtless, but why only men bodies to be objectified, how about women? why silence.. aha doublestandard why not show her vagina then?” – you see if I talk like this you easily realized the biased THEN SAME IT’S BIASED COMPARING BREAST (NON GENITAL + JUST HALF NAKED WOMEN) WITH FULLY FRONTAL NAKED MEN- it will more ‘exploiting’ male anatomy than the female one- if female can easily see male topless + bottomless yet you ‘sex negative hypocrite feminist’ demand men to only able to see female topless (while the bottom part of female is fully covered)..unfair…so men derided as sexist seeing vagina yet girl free to see the see penis? unfair to men.

Susan wengraf (another judge) then try to close the case by saying “there’s other important thing to do”, yeah if it about ‘male can see female bodies at public equally like the female one – who can see men bodies also’ she get mad yet if it about ‘banned page three’ – were men will be prohibited to see topless women yet women can still see topless male at newspaper, then she started act like “this is important”. you go Gypsy Taub !

Leave a comment »

This ‘momotaro69’ will less get updated from me since I’ll more focus on ‘reverseoblationrun’ account- Yes, we are same admin so Check it out!

Now time to be open this ’69momotaro69′ have a same admin with ‘reverseoblationrun’. So after consideration I have decided to more focus on ‘reverseoblationrun’ account (I couldn’t focus on two account so since ‘reverseoblationrun’ have more success – I’ll focus there but if I have time I’ll back here). So if you want to contact me you can contact via ‘reverseoblationrun’ account on twitter or instagram or email : reverseoblationrun [@] gmail [dot] com

Or minamotonomomotaro69 [@] gmail [dot] com (but probably I’ll less check email in here), or twitter @69momotaro69

desexualize breast 31118

Desexualize breast make it normal for true equality which then make us realize genital=genital (penis= VAGINA), which then ‘freethe vulva’ at U.s scene- not always ‘objectified’ penis.

Leave a comment »

Top 5 reason why ‘Free The Penis’= ‘FREE THE VAGINA’ (dick/ cock= VULVA/ PUSSY). While breast= Men Nipple (SAME ANATOMY).

  1. penis= VAGINA, both are PRIMARY reproduction, both between legs & infront asses, and both for PEEING. while breast are SECONDARY reproduction just like adam’s neck.
  2. How if it’s reverse? when men just half or semi naked, I ask female to show her vagina or full frontal naked? feminist (sex negative type) also disagree right? so don’t be hypocrite.
  3. How if I said “she saw our men butt then men must see her vagina, it’s fair since both private” you get my point? you see the fallacy comparison? same when mainstream compared (NON-GENITAL) breast with dick (male GENITAL).
  4. Isn’t funny if penis – male genital (which bigger than v) can be seen or not taboo? even if erect? yet female genital/ vagina which is smaller is taboo? that’s why to get rid this biased compared penis with VULVA, ok?
  5. What’s next if you said “men see breast or ‘women half naked bottom on’ then women must able to see men fully frontal naked or topless + bottomless”, if we follow this fail mindset then ‘what’s next?’ if female then bottomless equally like the men, what’s next? women must able to see men orgasm? or female can touch penis at public just because men see vagina at public? you understand now?

Female have privilege by the way, they can easily ask the wrong comparison like “if women semi naked then men must full frontal naked, equal!”, mainstream will just follow and listen sex negative feminist hypocrisy, while men have no privilege to said the reverse like that. This biased factor one of them is caused by ‘topless inequality’ so free the Nipple!

Free The Nipple 17d17

nip equal nip while penis equal VAGINA 17d17

This pic above is normal just like when clothed female selfie with topless guy, period. the premis should be “why women can see guy’s nipple- one side only? then men should able to see topless women too” << this is CORRECT. The wrong 1 if we started asking guy to fully naked just because female half naked. If you want guy show penis then show VAGINA too, to be equal right?

Naked equality free the vag 17d17 (1)

LEARN Asian! Learn sex negative HYPOCRITE feminist! Learn sexist religious people! Learn Mid East .. at least first learn hair will not make guy become animal rapist (except if you want to believe that).

Leave a comment »

Double Standard in Olympic water sport, hejab privilege in sport, and Happy Gotopless 2017

People often said “look there’s no double standard dresscode in Olympic like Polo or swimming, women wear one piece full clothed swimsuit because she feel comfortable, and it has been research too so that they can swim faster, men doesn’t need to worried on his chest, so to whom who think there’s double standard is hilarious”..No there’s something peculiar here, first actually both sexes (athletes) can wear male, and female version of swimsuit and still perform good, the reason one gender refuse to wear bottom on only while another is okay because society especially Asia or religious society teach female only that: shame-dignity concept, while men usually teach to be “macho” or shameless, so to said one gender feel more comfortable to justified double standard is biased.

Secondly about research, yes research make you perform faster, and yes female especially who live in Asia (which have strong shy-dignity concept) feel comfortable to wear it, but it stop until here, you can’t said because of research it suddenly become fair when it is not-if female can see male topless while male couldn’t have the reverse (in non sex context), let me give you an other example: a middle east women want to wear hejab costum for olympic because she brainwashed by ‘male rapist-I’m pearl’ concept, get accepted, and then researcher try to make hejab custom that good for sport-This doesn’t mean it equal right? so research just follow mainstream mindset what should we wear, and try to make the costum better.

Thirdly the most important parts are mainstream can easily “understand” even support hejab to have privilege to not follow custom rule, to break regulation by asking to wear hejab at sport & most of them accepted by sport comitte (No Research to begin with, disturb movement) why nobody dare to said like “so you hejabi think you’re better than researcher who have create the custom, hilarious” nobody dare right? because of political incorrectness. Now if I as a shy guy (for example) want to wear modest male swimsuit that covered top (which have been research too), if the first rule is men wear underwear only either I follow or quite-nobody give a fuck, so this is clearly double standard. Also if female who pro free the nipple want to topless at swim competition she will get shame even if actually topless doesn’t really drop her performance-just like men athletes right, so why only hejab female get privilege? while at the same time they claim they’re more oppressed than us?

I’m not, and couldn’t forcing. No power- mainstream will still apply double standard, but it still biased, and my rights to point it out-my view.

If people try to excused like opposing to topless equality, or free the nipple-I think I (& other free the nip supporter) already point out over, and over again the counter point why #FreeTheNipple.

2 be equal teach un or shy equally 25817

If you teach both sexes equal standard from kid, you’ll realize that “comfort” or “shy” excuse is not accurate.

*People who try to mock equality by saying “everything should be equal is ludicrous” maybe the correct word is: yes you who not yet adapt or still new by it feel “weird” that’s why you easily accept “equality=ludicrous” but the objective one is double standard is double standard, also topless equality is not “small” issues like you perceived.

Uh Oh It’s a day of #Gotopless Day!!!! Happy #ToplessEquality everyone!!!!

Leave a comment »

Topless Equality Random Point

Topless equality are possible, you can see at some Europe place, or even some place in U.s has already success normalize it (at least started to normalize it), mean it possible (not like perception of mainstream people-that it’ll be impossible). Topless equality can be apply but before that, we-people should be open minded first to female bodies (like we did to men), and want equality to happen-like U.s or Europe where people were more open minded & more not taboo to discuss everything.

There’s other tradition argument like it’ll “degrade women”, it’s subjective: if men, and women can see their opposite sexes topless equally at public, suddenly one-female being “degraded” while other not even if the situation is exactly the same, it’s double standard. You perceived women topless=slut or whores (even if she doesn’t mean to topless for sexual reason) while men topless=cool (even if he shirtless to show off his chest, and some women admire him). Other thing is what’s wrong for guy admire female topless? when female also free to admire topless guy? and like I said men can accustomed by it (this also debunking sexual excuse). Why men not degraded if women see him topless, and admire him, while women will be degraded if men admire topless female? It subjective, and double standard too, but people being cloud in seeing this since already get used to it, or already become a culture.

That “It sexual, he’ll get boner” argument, in Europe or New York female legal to topless publicly, where it show men can accustomed by it- so even somehow men can still get boner but if he know the right context (not disturb topless female) nothing wrong with that! the more it open to public the more people accustomed to it, the more it hidden from public the more it captivating when get reveal, if you go to Middle East you’ll see guy even can act like seeing “vagina” when they saw female leg or neck (when we know it not sexual-but that’s what they perceived, so if this mideast guy complain women must covered neck because it “sexual”-we know it not valid), in U.s women with her bra at public is accepted-guy do can get used to it, but some Southeast Asia country perceived it sexual because their society never normalize it (so if some southeast asia country said “don’t walk at street with bra only because it must be sexual”, we-U.s know it not valid), yet In Europe there’s a festival were both sexes naked publicly-and the guy can even accustomed to naked girl. Other way round If guy always modest at public strictly, women can more attracted when guy started shirtless-who know?

Other thing, some people think “if female can topless like men, why can’t male bottomless (like no female)?”, Their premis is wrong (since too much this topless inequality is being apply in our day to day life- make us biased seeing this) the correct one is : if male can topless all the time why can’t female topless equally? this is the correct one- if we want to be objective. Free the dick= Free The VAGINA, both are genital, both are primary reproduction, and both are between legs. It same like when “guy want female to free the V since men topless all the time” (you can see easily the biased right? then why you can’t when it’s about breast vs dick which is false comparison??), her breast= your hairy chest (both have nipple) #logic.

“There’s other important thing to do”, then should ask yourself why you (the cons one) so anger when you perceived this should not be big deal on the first place? I think you’re the one who should focus on other “important” thing rather than outrage and be busy about our movement. That doesn’t mean we should pretend topless inequality already “equal”, or we couldn’t express what we want to said or try to reach equality. More worse is when it’s about male, and female can see each other topless equally=everybody said “there’s other important thing so girl must covered” yet when I saw public festival (which truly unfair) because in that fest ‘male full naked while female doesn’t even half naked’=nobody said “there’s other important thing to do, so stop being naked guy”, why only outrage if female reveal (even just reveal equally like men) or get mad only if men can see it (even if men still get see lesser than what women can see at public)??? a hypocrite mindset apply by mainstream I see.

“How about your daughter?” if my daughter are old enough to have her own decision to topless like at New York-it’s her rights, stop prejudice based by sexes, also I never hear “how if your son bodies get seen by female?” (even if there’s exist male only naked / semi naked festival publicly at Asia, and U.s), I never hear mom have problem when their son being “objectified publicly”, again another hypocrisy by mainstream.

Women can breastfeeding whenever they need without must go to specific room in order to breastfeed-if she feel like that. People okay cleavage being display for sexy purpose yet when we add little skin-nipple in non sexual context everybody started loose their mind. Let female have their own bodies.

Yes, some random counter argument from mine, I didn’t really know what to update now…but I hope my argument can be used to counter people who oppose us-who are majority than us…If you have some idea or want to chat me: minamotonomomotaro69 [at] gmail [dot] com but I’m very rare seeing this email so mentioned me on twitter: 69momotaro69 or at here before send me an email.

Last thing is I’m glad to see there’s other people or organization that give their effort, and energy for this topless equality, and free the nipple issues, even hearing some of them success is a good step effort to achieved that goal-I’m happy for them..even if it still long (to achieved free the nipple) – keep it up!

Leave a comment »

Hejab or Burqa = More Fanatic Form of Sex Negative Feminist

I know this topic is scandalizes as it sound, and probably my pro free the nipple friend upset why I wrote like this (because I know somehow even if you support free the nipple, you support muslim at the same time). I want to point out from male perspective how hejab is unfair to men too, give you insight why half population still believe it’s “womenrights”, and why this is not about banning rights to wear. I know it unfair to women side too-which I often hear from sex positive feminist, and I’m not denying- that just want to add from other perspective. So please let me talk openly in here. I just want to be myself, and speak what I thought important (and since this topic is not mainstream, I’m PROUD to be the first who point out this).

Before start I understand also about how men-who-pro-hijab-mentality act, this men forced women what to wear-I get it, and also they “help” to create culture that unfair to men too actually.

Do you ever wonder why even after Westerner Atheist point out why “Muslim holy book” is not compatible for women rights, it’s look like the argument didn’t affect them? there’s still numerous of women come to Islam (beside their born there)? why is it there’s even many women claim it’s for women rights? I will not said my background but I know very well what ladies-pro-hijab mentality look like. So by just saying “women must covered is misogyny”, is not enough (maybe only Westerner that get it but not hejab girl (hejabi) itself). you must understand how hijab girl perceived (I’m not said I know everything but pretty sure this speculation is mostly true-I have observed it for long time).

It is because pro hejab girl, or muslim women itself have a mentality of sex-negative-feminist. Basically think female bodies have more “dignity” than male bodies, dislike men can see women bodies at public-perceived it degrading (more worse every skin of female bodies want to be considered “inappropriate” if men see it), yet at the same time dislike if she get the equal reverse situation treatment (dislike if women prohibited seeing male bodies at public or if it count as inappropriate). So “Muslim holy book” is very compatible with them (even in Quran the double standard dresscode is more contrast) so they see this as an advantage for women. They more think it’s “good” since the double standard ideology is easy to considered normal in the name of religion- like in Middle East society (they like this), and this is religion so it will make people afraid to questioned it, and also the cumpolsary in Islam to spread their believe (syari’a) include this unfair dresscode rule (which make more easy to spread this hejabi believe) this explain why this typical women view this as “womensrights”. In addition this mentality is brought to sex also where usually most of the time it’s male bodies more exploited while female one more less exploited like: the hijabi can have their sex fantasy exploiting male anatomy until the maximum one (blowjob brutal cum fantasy-tasting with mouth) while the men (lesser exploiting her) even just touching her still lesser than when this hijabi taste him + often she full clothes (Hijab / Burqa) after hijabi get her fantasy of exploiting men while her “dignity” is “protected”, mainstream still said they “sacrifice” for men (what a Bullshit) but hejabi like it. and in their sex culture mostly status quo like this. They love this “dignity win” concept & they think they-female Win, that’s the reason they try to spread their believe to create ‘Its only objectification/ sexism if Men see/ touch it’ culture because they think all women win if like that- Like sex-negative-feminist but the more hardcore one. This is the only one that they really concerned that’s the reason they don’t care about 9 years old girl married, don’t care of honor killing for women, don’t care when women must sit behind men, don’t care when other women get acid in her face, don’t care four wives, and don’t care female genital mutilation (banned male genital mutilation too by the way) etc.

I disagree when this hardcore muslimah (female) try to forced their rule, and believe to everybody- especially when it’s about: men seeing female hair or leg at public is considered “porn”, “objectification”, & “degrade” women, even if it just at public beach (not even her husband can see it), while women okay to see men with underwear at beach (even if it not her husband), this is not a great equality I think. They tend & bold to complaining even for smallest little thing to public mainstream like demanding women who already full clothes to wear more wider clothes because they hate that men can still see women curved (yet silence when in same society men peeing uncovered at public-which is more worse). After this so called “good muslimah girl” watching Magic Mike at movie (looking at hot shirtless men) they come out to complain about “how only women are objectified, and degraded”, again mainstream just easily listen to them because of what’s called political correctness especially in the name of religion + sex negative feminist…

Yup, I know there’s sex positive women who think that if women must covered at public, and never get oral pleasure is unfair too-I understand that. I wrote this specifically to pro hejab girl, and sex negative feminist … believe me this kind of people will easily understand when I wrote like this, maybe Europe people difficult to get it since by default they never experience this + already open to nudity (so couldn’t see from this perception).

Last, I understand that their “holy book” have unfairness towards female side too which already speak often, and often again, I not denying that but nether less I want people to understand from my point of view too-that unfairness happen to both sexes in Quran, and I point out how it unfair from men perspective especially from my personal view. I support women’s rights what to wear or not to wear at public (what I mentioned is the double standard apply by mainstream which create unfairness in most middle east), and ideology of ‘unfair dresscode were everybody must submit’ is different from female rights to wear, please differentiate that. I didn’t want to against Muslim or something like that- this just point out the reason what I disagree on Mid-East culture, and it’s my rights to exercise my freedom of speech.

Hijab turkey 24417 wp

Hejab Sexist to both Sexes 25a17

 

 

2 Comments »

Matt on Not-WordPress

Stuff and things.