Momotaro 69

The Limited Edition Of Crazyman In The World !

Some Topless Equality Photos Example (which show you from other perspective that it Possible)

Male admire female upper form is not objectification- just like female admire hot Korean topless actor, Female who body confidence to topless is not “slut”- just like when men topless all the time, it possible, look at this example evidence, even the 1 who you think fucking ludicrous to happen like big size breast is actually fucking possible – you who never live in topless equality place so by default easily perceived big size breast as “very offensive”. This is real equality: male & female seeing each other opposite sexes upper part in non sexual context at public equally is equal (how come only men derided as “sexist who objectified female”? you sex negative hypocrite feminist- like female never admire & photos shirtless guy).

Sex negative feminist try to mock this truth idea, so I repeat it again: THE MORE IT HIDDEN THE MORE IT CAPTIVATING, actually no significant different between us, if guy live at some Europe place where topless equality is normalize- yes guy can still attracted but it called admire, different from “obsessed crazily” since never see it like Mid east guy! Same if toplessness of male are make very strict-taboo all the time, when it reveal some female will probably more attracted curious to see/ scandalize, just like at 1930s (if I’m not wrong) were at U.s guy must covered his nip at beach, then 1 men show his nip at beach, and female curious to see the situation (maybe she couldn’t erect but they still show sign of curiosity, get it?).

Also some “macho” guy, and sex negative feminism so obsessed with ‘female modesty only that need to be protected’ til they scared when some guy wear “male bra” at football legal sport, Lol. They should know that it tech use to measure fitness level, but even if it just male bra, come on why should act like really difficult to accept male who want to – by himself – choose to cover his nip? “Oh here are the danger bla bla bla, so men must proudly show his nip to female” said sex negative feminist (then I imagine if reverse “Oh mind your own business, you mean try to lecture me on feminism? You are male! I’ll tell other girl to covered”…. hypocrisy).

Other thing is when it is an Asian martial art legal sport competition somehow we all perceived “offensive for female to wear (even just) a bit revealing custom (seen by male eyes)- she must very modest “Omg we record the competition for tv you know!? how if (just) cleavage of girl seen by men!? objectification, crime” (when female eyes bystander audience alone even very free to see ‘men wear sexy underwear’ only at sumo legal sport + feel free to laugh at male sumo wardrobe malfunction which do happen- off course they care wardrobe malfunction only if happen to women, right Asia mentality??), yet in my confusion then I saw West mma sport, and that perception of ‘equal dresscode is impossible, must apply gender role’ mentality suddenly just gone, we can see from different – open minded, equal – perspective: mma female fighter for example wear 2 piece sport clothes (& men wear modest enough bottom part too, so more balance, not too contrast like unfair sumo custom who only dare to ‘objectified’ men), so it possible for dresscode equality, it sport science (Europe science always better than Asia culture pseudoscience), no big deal, men able to know the context, women not “slut” for wearing that (again if audience can see West mma were the female & the male wear more balancing dress code, nothing wrong with that, so how come Asian feminist only think “Only female get objectified by male *since not as modest as what she want*”?).

1548343590795

D6Fx_hlXsAANoFl

D6Fx_hpWwAARwUe

DDxLbdOW0AAz96d

DFvZXu5XgAA178n

DH9c49pW0AAObdr

DI4-GZnW0AAAZza

Screenshot_20180810-232433

Leave a comment »

‘Female form seen by male’ is always perceived impossible/ offensive (than if the sexes were reverse), until it truly be done (i.e Europe)

Have you ever heard something sound like “Female topless? You’re crazy! Female upper part is different, I can’t imagine if the big breast pop up at public, I’m really mad!”

So when male upper part vs female upper part, they compared it size…(even though there’s female with flat chest, and male with big nip…

…it’s funny since if we talk about human bottom part: male genital are far bigger than female genital (Vagina- small) but never hear people said “Omg, male genital can erect you know? It’s more offensive if penis at public than vagina”, mainstream even don’t care if there’s an erect male genital (penis) at public (while – small – vagina not shown). So if they don’t bother the comparison size of genital, why they do compare between male chest & female chest?

…Okay back to the excused from the mainstream, When I once support topless equality in Asia here, when sex negative modesty feminism  argue like that, I once confused, I thought “Yeah it seem impossible.. it seem offensive”, then I see Europe (yes, not all Europe suddenly show topless female at public- but Europe do different they have more place i.e beach or festival were female topless at public in non sexual context (equally with male), and even if the breast are big in shape it normal, no big deal, and possible), so in Europe we can see it as ‘make senses’ (especially now many body confidence female raise awareness on topless equality too by exercising topless at public garden, topless experiment at day street etc- with no big deal happen, guy able to know the context, and make it more normalize), while if we in “Asian/southasia atmosphere” it seem fucking offensive/ impossible/ we can’t think it without big deal happening in here.

…But difficult to explain to Asia/ southasia people since even just hear ‘freethenipple’ word most of them already loose their mind..

…Now Asia people still can understand female in bikini at pool is fucking possible/ no offensive at all, bring ‘bikini’ word to middle east atmosphere, and Mideast people will get mad just like when Asian get mad over ‘topless’ word (but we know bikini can exist at Asia, and Topless equality can exist at part of Europe), so the same to breast if normalize in Asia society – people can just accept it just like bikini…(but off course I know to change culture it take progress which can have a risk at beginning)…but still show equality is possible to be achieve.

The same apply on movie censorship in my place, it’s always male nudity that more be ‘objectified’ with no censor at movie theater, they said “We are different”..it confused me for a while (I still know it unfair if ‘objectified male semi nudity only more frontally’ but) I doubt can movie legally show male nip vs female nip fairly, male buttcrack vs female buttcrack equally? The answer is yes! See Korean adult legal movie (a story which have sex scene on it) they do only censored genital equally (not like other who only dare to objectified penis while protect vagina modesty), they show female nip & male nip + female buttcrack vs male buttcrack fairly (not like other who only objectified male buttcrack & male nip at movie), after see that korean movie i realize ‘equality in anatomy’ fucking possible (why I think it impossible- till I watch that korean 18+ movie).

It’s a religious bigot & sex negative feminism who try to play ‘impossible’ mindset, and they depend on “look at our culture, if can- it already happen in the past” this excused… even in the past- my culture have female semi nudity in non sexual context at public too actually, very normal at that time… till they (sex negative feminism, prudish tourist, religious government) who are the one who forced it to be banned (till it seem very taboo now, and we must be like “here we go again explaining it possible”)…

NOT FORGOT HV CUNNI 24519

Korea show cunnilingus by guy scene too (not like other who by pc cult only dare to show blowjob scene aka ‘always only dare to show male anatomy get objectified by female senses’ scene).

Screenshot_20190523-140235_Gallery

Korean adult movie show female nip equally (not always objectified male nip like other does)

Screenshot_20190523-140636_Gallery

Show that it fact female can have sexual feeling too on men bodies (opposite from sex negative feminist claim)

STRIP UNDIE 24519

Korean adult movie is the fairest, have scene were handsome male strip undie/ pants of female too (not like other who by pc cult only dare to show scene were ‘only guy are humiliated get strip down by female’). They even show what true anatomy equality is by censored only genital fairly (so people understand penis= Vagina)

….

“Sumo costum is impossible to be equal, they said” well a German legal sport festival were female & male topless + bottom on equally at public they never said…

Naked Snow-Sledding Competition In Saxony

Nacktrodeln in Altenberg

 

Leave a comment »

Male buttcrack = Female buttcrack (Buttcrack Equality), Share

To: Asian Legal Media i.e Asian film/ movie editor & producer

Please understand that:

Male full buttcrack =/= female with underwear

Male full buttcrack  =  Female Full Buttcrack

So stop ‘objectfying’ Male Full Buttcrack only

I said this because sex negative feminist act like they don’t know

That’s why support sex Positive feminism 😉

Ukrainan Beach Klondike 14217 (5)

Wnbr anynomous 25817 (1)

Wnbr anynomous 25817 (2)

Wnbr anynomous 25817 (3)

Leave a comment »

Propaganda of sex negative feminist, and religious bigot make anatomy comparison more unfair, and contrast

I just want to tell about sexist situation that seem nonsense/ peculiar but it happen, in past in this society –  were I live in – when I was younger, it’s normal for a girl wear two piece of swimsuit (modest/ not) at swimming pool (remember: men are also wear underwear/ boxer seen by a female at pool, so stop play victim card hypocrite sex negative feminism), so bare in mind that it’s very normal at pool for men & women to see their opposite sexes wear suit in non sexual context at pool (no big deal). Other thing in past is it’s normal if cleavage seen/ show at tv (remember: men are also topless at tv very often, so you can’t play victim sex negative feminism – I know as advocate of topless equality for me ‘topless female= topless male’, but for the sake of mainstream people who don’t understand topless equality, so let assump “bra top= topless guy”- for this sake of article only), so bare in mind for audience to see topless male and cleavage (/ bra top) is perfectly normal- nobody take it seriously, no actress nor actor nor audience take it seriously (nonsense to angry over shirtless guy or cleavage, right?).

Now time flies, and now you’ll notice the change in our society: (only) female who even wear full clothed suit even if already at pool (while the guy wear short as usual), now (only) female who will be censored strictly if at tv even (just) over a cleavage- clothed female, and yes now people will perceived this as “normal”, and claim this as “our real culture, stupid!” especially our newest generation. So now ‘female see male shirtless wear boxer at pool or tv’= “okay”, yet if reverse ‘a guy see female wear 2 piece swimsuit even if already at pool’= “Omg, so you make this article to objectified female? I’m disgust with pervert like you, I will protect my female modesty!”- something like this (playing victim) by our new generation. Conclusion ‘it’s only sexist if men see it’ cult, and ‘objectification only bad if happen to female’ mentality.

There’s other worse case, once I complain why only male full buttcrack can be ‘objectified’ at 13+ rating movie here (when the reverse even if already at 21+ movie- female buttcrack will be cut/ censored strictly)? No respond from authority (several time I speak.. tired to give so much effort with negative respond from authority & mainstream), yet when a religious (hejabi) feminist complain over local youtube advert about a (Clothed) girl band (who still wear double layer + covered top & bottom) who this hejabi somehow perceived as “naked”, guess what? The authority fucking respond, they check it whether the complain is right (probably we hope the authority then laugh at this right? But no) they give  an official warning to the organizer who make the advert, or other new worse case thing here: management of local “disney” here can covered just a topless female mermaid statue, again statue.. while at our local tv channel sometime show more frontal/ vulgar M-a-l-e nudity/ semi nudity with nobody angry, contrast right?

This happen because – my biggest speculation – a religious bigot, and a sex negative ‘hypocrite’ feminist propaganda which get responded by an elite of tv (for applying “it only sexist if men see it” cult, or “objectification only bad if happen to female” mentality). In past people of that generation can fully understand that 2 piece of swimsuit= male wear short, now if you ask new generation, they will accussed us as “digusting pervert”, and start play “objectification” victim card (as sex negative feminine feminist teach/ propaganda). Difficult to make a change religious bigot & sex negative feminist already win this brainwashing.

I forgot that this not only give unfairness to male, but to female too! A body confidence girl will easily be shame as “whores” for choosing to be different from religious modesty obsessed female. She will get peer pressure from her surrounding.

I must be honest most female here are sex negative feminist that have mentality like “yeay, female win we can see male shirtless at public while guy couldn’t even see us with bra top at pool, haha”- hypocrite selfish thinking like that. Okay they (sex negative feminine hypocrite feminist) will give excused like “female must more covered because men can rape & harass, while no men harass/ rape victim at all!” (then think she win by this), my answer is: yes, most rape/ harass happen to female- although many enough male victim of rape/ harass too (even by female predator) which unfortunately people don’t give a fuck, but it fallacy to mix this up.. you see- Europe never listen this kind of ‘modesty hypocrite obsessed girl’, and thanks to Europe they make us realize that ‘men will not rape just because female wear bikini at pool’, or female wear bikini at pool is normal, imagine if we listen to this bast*rd sex negative feminism and become like Mideast- we’ll never realize that society such as Europe can exist.

Once a female angry to me “Just because female see topless men at public doesn’t mean female objectified you, get it!!!!” now if she said that ‘female see male shirtless doesn’t mean objectification’ the same can be apply to the reverse, it goes both way! A guy see female in bikini at pool is not objectification too (worse at same time that girl try to convince me that ‘male see female cleavage even at pool, even if the guy not think dirty is still “degraded women” such a hypocrite), okay maybe you will reply “But female get rape or harass, you understand, while women never rape nor harass a male” (I already answer on above paragraph) but my other reply is: how about a guy who don’t harass, nor rape but happen at pool & see female in bikini???

“O how if your daughter wear bikini seen by other guy, huh!? Checkmate! Hahaha” First bikini is normal at pool, secondly: a mother also never care his son wear short, or even naked seen by female bystander eyes at public for ‘male (objectification) only naked fest’ (evidence is cfnm fest at some Asia country like one of them is male naked fan dance in Japan, or holy bath Gangga river India), so you’re the 1 who get checkmate for your hypocrisy, until mom & daughter care their father, brother, and her son modesty first.

I forgot to said that I’m from Asia, and from what I know Europe is far more fair in this body equality issues, so Europe you should protect your beautiful equal culture from Asian mentality, okay!? Share!

I know difficult to have a change, this argument is my coping of my frustration, but I believe even if slow thing can change better to be more equal, so help me to share this!

Next article is about why me support topless equality, and the prejudice stereotype that pop up since I’m a male.

Nacktrodeln in Altenberg

1 Comment »

Big size breast=/= couldn’t have free the nipple (& genital=genital aka penis=VAGINA)

About mainstream who thought “female topless at public is fucking taboo, I can’t imagine if it happen! Look some size is big so now porn come at public, huh?” something sound like this (especially Asia, religious, conservative, or prudish society). That kind of perception will easily & strongly pop up if you live at society who never have free the nipple/ were breast is taboo at public. This kind of perception is subjective, if you live at some part of Europe were female nipple/ breast is just normal as a male nipple- that kind of perception will not/ lesser to happen (no matter what size or shape the breast is), so to claim free the nipple (topless equality) is impossible just by your own subjective perception is invalid. Yes, I do know it not easy to be accepted at society who have culture “only female modesty need to be protected, while men not” thing, The society need to hv female topless regulary in non sexual context (by her own will off course) just as regular as the male one then it can be seen as something normal (but again not easy if the minority not try to atleast satire our mainstream, and do need process, *and in some society like Mid-east it more difficult maybe in free the nip process can have many victim at first- since even hair is problematic there, so therefore for me mid-east learn to accept female hair first, okay?).

Look it funny how majority of (ignorance) people can said “if female ½ naked & show non genital nipple (which male do already show his too), then don’t get mad if male fully naked & show male genital”- biased & funny because they don’t angry if ‘female can see male nip + His genital + bonus male butt too aka she can see male fully naked at public’ yet outrage as fuck if it’s about ‘male can see (just) female’s (non genital) nip (only- were female ass + her genital still fully protected) aka male just seeing female ½ naked (only- not to forgot female already see male topless all the time too’). Basically just imagine if reverse in a parallel world were men couldn’t topless, female prohibit to see topless male & men fight for his rights to topless suddenly some girl bottomless (so male can see it)…you see my point? it goes both way… the same if you compared fully exposed frontal naked male with just 1/2 naked female it biased.

Finally having equality doesn’t mean other gender should get more right? (female finally can have same topless equality as men does without need to slut shaming fairly & male can see breast in more natural way – so not curious/ obsessed anymore – just like female have rights to see male shirtless without need to feel guilty & male do can accustomed with it- seeing topless female in more nature way) doesn’t mean when we already get this (topless) equality suddenly we should create a new double standard again.

Other shitty thing from mainstream, feminine modesty female, sex negative feminist girl, religious group, legal political correctness media (like sexist Bbc shit) is whenever it about the contrast public festival were ‘male fully naked seen by female- were the female not even ¼ naked’= normal day “why should angry” thing Yet when it’s about equality were male & female can see their opposite sexes ½ naked fairly= suddenly gender issues of “only female get objectified by evil male eyes”.

IMG_20180608_110710

Leave a comment »

Mensrights female= sex negative feminism who hide in ‘mensrights’ to attack ‘free the nipple’ feminism?

Do you ever see a female who are against free the nipple (& called herself as “mensrights”- even though not all men who are in that group are against free the nipple since they know free the nipple give equality to general (to women) & to male too just from differ perspective, not in pervy senses by the way), yet this kind of ‘feminine modesty female’ keep ‘preaching’ & trying to lead people to think “If you’re mensrights then must be against topless equality”- a.k.a support double standard tradition with I found it funny, this kind of so called “pro men” female can (act) angry over gillette adv who claim men are predator yet she alone often preach that ‘real life unisex toilet is danger’ because “all men are potential rapist” or ‘free the nipple is impossible’ because “ALL MEN ARE ANIMAL WHO COULDN’T CONTROL HIMSELF, EVEN IF FREE THE NIPPLE ALREADY NORMALIZE” (never see some Europe part? Where topless equality is normalise & no big deal?), also play double standard objectification victim card “only angry if male able to see female nipple, yet never complain the reverse”. Straight to the point she is Sex Negative Feminism (opposite from body confidence feminism), and this female too obsessed with modesty, and gender role that’s why they okay too for shaming other female who are body confidence or other female who try to raise awareness of double standard slut shaming. The clever thing is this “mensrights female” hide behind “mensrights” so more ‘cloud’ a gullible people, share this for awareness. Anyway this topless equality picture to triggered people who are against us- the ball is in our hand, the body is yours so they really can’t do too much.

guy-topless-women-whip-vagina

a body part so tiny shouldnt cause riot 3

bwbypiecaae3dtl

topless great lesson te kids

topless together equality blurred

Leave a comment »

Free The Nipple Family Animation, Finally! Have some Topless Equality.

I remember in my younger age, I get shock when in the mainstream were even to make animation of female (non genital) nipple is already considered very taboo, couldn’t family rating & “degrade female” – that politically correctness culture claim – yet there’s a people who even easily make animation short story that display male genital a.k.a penis (if you don’t get it: 1/2 female nudity animation can be considered more taboo than male full frontal animation), so funny if I couldn’t imagine family animation can show half female nudity without mainstream (especially feminist) get mad, yet there’s a fucking family animation that easily show penis/ male full nudity, isn’t it unfair? (that’s animation story about david statue which piss me off & I already ‘protest’ by the way).

But finally I found an animation that show female nipple + female buttcrack – although not yet show vagina, the equivalent of dick – this still a good positive step for nudity equality, I hope people can more be fair, free thinker, and don’t get trap by pc culture, sex negative feminist mentality, or even religion mindset.. just because majority of people think “okay” to apply inequality in nudity doesn’t mean they are “right”, speak up our mind (even if just in social media) that we want genital equality, or at very least both censored fairly.

I even remember seeing newspaper were journalist took a photos with tribe couple – the men almost naked show his ball, the female already more modest have skirt – yet the journalist censored only (non genital) breast while display balls..it happen when I travel in some South Asia, unfortunately I forgot to capture that unfair censorship photos- but you can use lie detector to me.

480p - (6) CGI Animated Short Film HD Goutte d_Or Short Film by Happy Flyfish - YouTube.mkv_000349280

480p - (6) CGI Animated Short Film HD Goutte d_Or Short Film by Happy Flyfish - YouTube.mkv_000430120

SHARE IF YOU WANT TO HELP RAISE AWARENESS OF EQUALITY, PENIS= VAGINA (NOT ANYTHING ELSE). IF YOU KNOW WHO CREATE THIS SAY MY THANKS TO THEM, AND HOPEFULLY IN FUTURE THEY SHOW NON SEXUAL VULVA ANIMATION.

Leave a comment »

Asia Misandry: toilet, male urinal that can easily be seen from outside, and female janitor that can enter men toilet.

As a men I disagree with ‘male urinal (peeing place) that can easily be seen from outside public’ (specifically in Asia region – I’m more fine with Europe since they apply equality, Europe have the reverse too: female urinoir), I also disagree when female janitor/ staff can easily enter men toilet.  If you ask why, it is because in Asia if the situation were reverse – example female version of urinal/ other female room that can be seen from outside public, or if men janitor can enter female toilet – it will be seen as “offensive”, so it’s double standard. This have unfairness to men too like ‘it only sexist if men see his opposite sex peeing activity’ (yet “ok” if reverse), or ‘it only sexist if men enter his opposite sex bathroom’ (yet “ok” if reverse). Other thing is if male seeing female activity when peeing easily considered by mainstream that “female already been degrade by men” then why the reverse ‘female who see male peeing’ (coincidentally or not) is not fairly considered as ‘degraded male’ too? If you said “no women peeping” my answer is: you fear men can peeping hence your objection is ‘men will SEE his opposite sex peeing’ right? then a female janitor enter male room, or male urinal that can easily be seen from outside public is also about ‘Female can SEE her opposite sex pee’ even if it’s accidentally but the essential is SAME, and who knows if there’s a female that happy can easily see men peeing at public toilet? So either both have equal privacy, or both are okay to see each other peeing. by the way I often accidentally see men underwear, or even men butt/ peeing dick at male toilet (even if i try not to see it), so no excused like “Oh female will not see anything”.

Bonus topless equality photos (before you accused me as “sexist” remember ‘men shirtless already exposed all over media even the legal one) so the premis should be ‘why women can see men topless yet men will derided as sexist?’, also from other perspective ‘why men can topless without being labelled even if his purpose is for show his chest muscle? yet women will easily get pressure, and labelled negatively if she confidence to topless in non sexual context’. Stop double standard based by sexes, yes probably you still said that this double standard is somehow justified as “equal”, but I tell you my friend ‘double standard is double standard’ period.

This just topless like a male ok (2)

This just topless like a male ok (3)

This just topless like a male ok (4)

 

Leave a comment »

Why Topless Equality Crucial for Naked Equality (or Censored Equality a.k.a get rid double standard)

It’s crucial because by normalizing topless equality, we prevent mainstream people from  ‘patent the wrong equality’ at public a.k.a normalize false comparison between men & women anatomy as “equal”. Mainstream always biased since from born they always see (at public) ‘men only covered genital’ with ‘women covered genital + breast’ (plus religion), people who don’t interested on this issues will just easily often compared dick with breast (if you don’t get it, it same like comparing naked female with topless men). Other example in Middle East men can topless while women covered hair (even face) at public .. so people in mid east can easily said like this “if you want our women wear bikini only, think how if you guy swim naked?”-false comparison. Biased in considering what’s nudity. Sometime funny for me when people quite in unfair condition (men topless while women not) yet when (minor) free the nipple activist try to raise awareness for true equality, mainstream started loose their mind (to the true equality issues) yet (not only that) at the same time promote freethedick (promote new worse double standard).

Unfairness happen to both side because of this:

To men-people angry if we (men) objectified our nipple equally with women nipple at public, yet perfectly fine if we objectified our penis (male genital) + male butt + our hairy chest while female only topless, more worse they claim it “equal”. Like somehow men eyes more “evil” (if you don’t believe me see how mainstream (react) not okay over topless equality idea + at the same time promote free the dick idea-when women not say free vagina).

To women-she get labelled “whores”, or treated as exhibitionist for showing nipple like men always did. People even more okay to full naked guy than just topless female (just see mainstream said free the dick just because she want topless equally like men). In most place women have more chance to get jailed if she just half or semi naked at public than a men who (even) full nude at public (my observation).

So support topless equality, women who confidence with her body to topless is not more “bad” than men who choose to topless. Guy admiring topless female is same like ladies who admiring hot shirtless guy. So get rid double standard.

By normalize topless equality, people will slowly but surely can differentiate between wrong comparison, and true comparison. The non-interest one (on this subject) will not crazily attack us with their fallacy comparison too. The passive one will not confused anymore & all more easy to support true equality a.k.a Free The NIPPLE!

Wp Importance of top equality 18617 (1)

This just a guy who happen shirtless at public, why problem?Wp Importance of top equality 18617 (2)

Credit: @Toplessnewyork (twitter)

We shouldn’t outrage if guy play chess topless, shouldn’t we?OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

This is just normal topless at beach, and should learn to normalize it-the faster the better.

1 Comment »

Historical Photos of Free The Nipple, And Why Topless Doesn’t Mean “Backwards”

Some historical photos where women can free the nipple-unfortunately it change now.

Some people have an excuse “It because our society become more modern, free the nipple is backwards like when cave era that’s why now this tradition change”, this perception is fallacy I think it more because there’s a moment when our past generation (even we) see (women only) modesty is a “right” thing which make them (& us) become prudish society (which then this mentality radicalize by sex negative feminist & religion), by this it make us more difficult to see free the nipple is about equality & possible. This result many kind of excused against free the nipple one of them is like the one I just mentioned.

In Middle East women covered from head to toe that doesn’t mean modern right while at Europe women can free the nipple (Fact) and their society are modern at the same time.

Why topless male isn’t claim as backwards then? (if you labelled topless female “backwards”?), it’s more about double standard that we apply here.

Nothing wrong for men to see topless women if women can see men topless all the time, and nothing wrong for women to free the nipple in non sexual context if she confidence since men did it all the time (it’s possible the photos below itself show us it possible even in the old one photos, don’t think it’s already past instead of seeing all people in that society & generation doesn’t make a big deal, and can get used with it-freethenipple.

japan-history-semi-naked-public-fml-possible-11-nov-16
Japan Free The Nipple near the sea society

history-topless-society-possible-2
Bali or Malaysia

history-topless-society-possible-1
Bali or Malaysia

history-topless-society-possible-3
Bali or Malaysia

no-big-deal-if-ftn-normalize-41216
Free The Nipple in modern Society-Possible.

taiwan-ftn-non-sexual
Some Women are okay actually for Free The Nipple-in non sexual context, and by their courage for free the nipple & not listening what majority said, we can change society to be more equal & not childish when it come to female bodies.

Leave a comment »