Momotaro 69

The Limited Edition Of Crazyman In The World !

Some Topless Equality Photos Example (which show you from other perspective that it Possible)

Male admire female upper form is not objectification- just like female admire hot Korean topless actor, Female who body confidence to topless is not “slut”- just like when men topless all the time, it possible, look at this example evidence, even the 1 who you think fucking ludicrous to happen like big size breast is actually fucking possible – you who never live in topless equality place so by default easily perceived big size breast as “very offensive”. This is real equality: male & female seeing each other opposite sexes upper part in non sexual context at public equally is equal (how come only men derided as “sexist who objectified female”? you sex negative hypocrite feminist- like female never admire & photos shirtless guy).

Sex negative feminist try to mock this truth idea, so I repeat it again: THE MORE IT HIDDEN THE MORE IT CAPTIVATING, actually no significant different between us, if guy live at some Europe place where topless equality is normalize- yes guy can still attracted but it called admire, different from “obsessed crazily” since never see it like Mid east guy! Same if toplessness of male are make very strict-taboo all the time, when it reveal some female will probably more attracted curious to see/ scandalize, just like at 1930s (if I’m not wrong) were at U.s guy must covered his nip at beach, then 1 men show his nip at beach, and female curious to see the situation (maybe she couldn’t erect but they still show sign of curiosity, get it?).

Also some “macho” guy, and sex negative feminism so obsessed with ‘female modesty only that need to be protected’ til they scared when some guy wear “male bra” at football legal sport, Lol. They should know that it tech use to measure fitness level, but even if it just male bra, come on why should act like really difficult to accept male who want to – by himself – choose to cover his nip? “Oh here are the danger bla bla bla, so men must proudly show his nip to female” said sex negative feminist (then I imagine if reverse “Oh mind your own business, you mean try to lecture me on feminism? You are male! I’ll tell other girl to covered”…. hypocrisy).

Other thing is when it is an Asian martial art legal sport competition somehow we all perceived “offensive for female to wear (even just) a bit revealing custom (seen by male eyes)- she must very modest “Omg we record the competition for tv you know!? how if (just) cleavage of girl seen by men!? objectification, crime” (when female eyes bystander audience alone even very free to see ‘men wear sexy underwear’ only at sumo legal sport + feel free to laugh at male sumo wardrobe malfunction which do happen- off course they care wardrobe malfunction only if happen to women, right Asia mentality??), yet in my confusion then I saw West mma sport, and that perception of ‘equal dresscode is impossible, must apply gender role’ mentality suddenly just gone, we can see from different – open minded, equal – perspective: mma female fighter for example wear 2 piece sport clothes (& men wear modest enough bottom part too, so more balance, not too contrast like unfair sumo custom who only dare to ‘objectified’ men), so it possible for dresscode equality, it sport science (Europe science always better than Asia culture pseudoscience), no big deal, men able to know the context, women not “slut” for wearing that (again if audience can see West mma were the female & the male wear more balancing dress code, nothing wrong with that, so how come Asian feminist only think “Only female get objectified by male *since not as modest as what she want*”?).

1548343590795

D6Fx_hlXsAANoFl

D6Fx_hpWwAARwUe

DDxLbdOW0AAz96d

DFvZXu5XgAA178n

DH9c49pW0AAObdr

DI4-GZnW0AAAZza

Screenshot_20180810-232433

Advertisements
Leave a comment »

‘Female form seen by male’ is always perceived impossible/ offensive (than if the sexes were reverse), until it truly be done (i.e Europe)

Have you ever heard something sound like “Female topless? You’re crazy! Female upper part is different, I can’t imagine if the big breast pop up at public, I’m really mad!”

So when male upper part vs female upper part, they compared it size…(even though there’s female with flat chest, and male with big nip…

…it’s funny since if we talk about human bottom part: male genital are far bigger than female genital (Vagina- small) but never hear people said “Omg, male genital can erect you know? It’s more offensive if penis at public than vagina”, mainstream even don’t care if there’s an erect male genital (penis) at public (while – small – vagina not shown). So if they don’t bother the comparison size of genital, why they do compare between male chest & female chest?

…Okay back to the excused from the mainstream, When I once support topless equality in Asia here, when sex negative modesty feminism  argue like that, I once confused, I thought “Yeah it seem impossible.. it seem offensive”, then I see Europe (yes, not all Europe suddenly show topless female at public- but Europe do different they have more place i.e beach or festival were female topless at public in non sexual context (equally with male), and even if the breast are big in shape it normal, no big deal, and possible), so in Europe we can see it as ‘make senses’ (especially now many body confidence female raise awareness on topless equality too by exercising topless at public garden, topless experiment at day street etc- with no big deal happen, guy able to know the context, and make it more normalize), while if we in “Asian/southasia atmosphere” it seem fucking offensive/ impossible/ we can’t think it without big deal happening in here.

…But difficult to explain to Asia/ southasia people since even just hear ‘freethenipple’ word most of them already loose their mind..

…Now Asia people still can understand female in bikini at pool is fucking possible/ no offensive at all, bring ‘bikini’ word to middle east atmosphere, and Mideast people will get mad just like when Asian get mad over ‘topless’ word (but we know bikini can exist at Asia, and Topless equality can exist at part of Europe), so the same to breast if normalize in Asia society – people can just accept it just like bikini…(but off course I know to change culture it take progress which can have a risk at beginning)…but still show equality is possible to be achieve.

The same apply on movie censorship in my place, it’s always male nudity that more be ‘objectified’ with no censor at movie theater, they said “We are different”..it confused me for a while (I still know it unfair if ‘objectified male semi nudity only more frontally’ but) I doubt can movie legally show male nip vs female nip fairly, male buttcrack vs female buttcrack equally? The answer is yes! See Korean adult legal movie (a story which have sex scene on it) they do only censored genital equally (not like other who only dare to objectified penis while protect vagina modesty), they show female nip & male nip + female buttcrack vs male buttcrack fairly (not like other who only objectified male buttcrack & male nip at movie), after see that korean movie i realize ‘equality in anatomy’ fucking possible (why I think it impossible- till I watch that korean 18+ movie).

It’s a religious bigot & sex negative feminism who try to play ‘impossible’ mindset, and they depend on “look at our culture, if can- it already happen in the past” this excused… even in the past- my culture have female semi nudity in non sexual context at public too actually, very normal at that time… till they (sex negative feminism, prudish tourist, religious government) who are the one who forced it to be banned (till it seem very taboo now, and we must be like “here we go again explaining it possible”)…

NOT FORGOT HV CUNNI 24519

Korea show cunnilingus by guy scene too (not like other who by pc cult only dare to show blowjob scene aka ‘always only dare to show male anatomy get objectified by female senses’ scene).

Screenshot_20190523-140235_Gallery

Korean adult movie show female nip equally (not always objectified male nip like other does)

Screenshot_20190523-140636_Gallery

Show that it fact female can have sexual feeling too on men bodies (opposite from sex negative feminist claim)

STRIP UNDIE 24519

Korean adult movie is the fairest, have scene were handsome male strip undie/ pants of female too (not like other who by pc cult only dare to show scene were ‘only guy are humiliated get strip down by female’). They even show what true anatomy equality is by censored only genital fairly (so people understand penis= Vagina)

….

“Sumo costum is impossible to be equal, they said” well a German legal sport festival were female & male topless + bottom on equally at public they never said…

Naked Snow-Sledding Competition In Saxony

Nacktrodeln in Altenberg

 

Leave a comment »

Propaganda of sex negative feminist, and religious bigot make anatomy comparison more unfair, and contrast

I just want to tell about sexist situation that seem nonsense/ peculiar but it happen, in past in this society –  were I live in – when I was younger, it’s normal for a girl wear two piece of swimsuit (modest/ not) at swimming pool (remember: men are also wear underwear/ boxer seen by a female at pool, so stop play victim card hypocrite sex negative feminism), so bare in mind that it’s very normal at pool for men & women to see their opposite sexes wear suit in non sexual context at pool (no big deal). Other thing in past is it’s normal if cleavage seen/ show at tv (remember: men are also topless at tv very often, so you can’t play victim sex negative feminism – I know as advocate of topless equality for me ‘topless female= topless male’, but for the sake of mainstream people who don’t understand topless equality, so let assump “bra top= topless guy”- for this sake of article only), so bare in mind for audience to see topless male and cleavage (/ bra top) is perfectly normal- nobody take it seriously, no actress nor actor nor audience take it seriously (nonsense to angry over shirtless guy or cleavage, right?).

Now time flies, and now you’ll notice the change in our society: (only) female who even wear full clothed suit even if already at pool (while the guy wear short as usual), now (only) female who will be censored strictly if at tv even (just) over a cleavage- clothed female, and yes now people will perceived this as “normal”, and claim this as “our real culture, stupid!” especially our newest generation. So now ‘female see male shirtless wear boxer at pool or tv’= “okay”, yet if reverse ‘a guy see female wear 2 piece swimsuit even if already at pool’= “Omg, so you make this article to objectified female? I’m disgust with pervert like you, I will protect my female modesty!”- something like this (playing victim) by our new generation. Conclusion ‘it’s only sexist if men see it’ cult, and ‘objectification only bad if happen to female’ mentality.

There’s other worse case, once I complain why only male full buttcrack can be ‘objectified’ at 13+ rating movie here (when the reverse even if already at 21+ movie- female buttcrack will be cut/ censored strictly)? No respond from authority (several time I speak.. tired to give so much effort with negative respond from authority & mainstream), yet when a religious (hejabi) feminist complain over local youtube advert about a (Clothed) girl band (who still wear double layer + covered top & bottom) who this hejabi somehow perceived as “naked”, guess what? The authority fucking respond, they check it whether the complain is right (probably we hope the authority then laugh at this right? But no) they give  an official warning to the organizer who make the advert, or other new worse case thing here: management of local “disney” here can covered just a topless female mermaid statue, again statue.. while at our local tv channel sometime show more frontal/ vulgar M-a-l-e nudity/ semi nudity with nobody angry, contrast right?

This happen because – my biggest speculation – a religious bigot, and a sex negative ‘hypocrite’ feminist propaganda which get responded by an elite of tv (for applying “it only sexist if men see it” cult, or “objectification only bad if happen to female” mentality). In past people of that generation can fully understand that 2 piece of swimsuit= male wear short, now if you ask new generation, they will accussed us as “digusting pervert”, and start play “objectification” victim card (as sex negative feminine feminist teach/ propaganda). Difficult to make a change religious bigot & sex negative feminist already win this brainwashing.

I forgot that this not only give unfairness to male, but to female too! A body confidence girl will easily be shame as “whores” for choosing to be different from religious modesty obsessed female. She will get peer pressure from her surrounding.

I must be honest most female here are sex negative feminist that have mentality like “yeay, female win we can see male shirtless at public while guy couldn’t even see us with bra top at pool, haha”- hypocrite selfish thinking like that. Okay they (sex negative feminine hypocrite feminist) will give excused like “female must more covered because men can rape & harass, while no men harass/ rape victim at all!” (then think she win by this), my answer is: yes, most rape/ harass happen to female- although many enough male victim of rape/ harass too (even by female predator) which unfortunately people don’t give a fuck, but it fallacy to mix this up.. you see- Europe never listen this kind of ‘modesty hypocrite obsessed girl’, and thanks to Europe they make us realize that ‘men will not rape just because female wear bikini at pool’, or female wear bikini at pool is normal, imagine if we listen to this bast*rd sex negative feminism and become like Mideast- we’ll never realize that society such as Europe can exist.

Once a female angry to me “Just because female see topless men at public doesn’t mean female objectified you, get it!!!!” now if she said that ‘female see male shirtless doesn’t mean objectification’ the same can be apply to the reverse, it goes both way! A guy see female in bikini at pool is not objectification too (worse at same time that girl try to convince me that ‘male see female cleavage even at pool, even if the guy not think dirty is still “degraded women” such a hypocrite), okay maybe you will reply “But female get rape or harass, you understand, while women never rape nor harass a male” (I already answer on above paragraph) but my other reply is: how about a guy who don’t harass, nor rape but happen at pool & see female in bikini???

“O how if your daughter wear bikini seen by other guy, huh!? Checkmate! Hahaha” First bikini is normal at pool, secondly: a mother also never care his son wear short, or even naked seen by female bystander eyes at public for ‘male (objectification) only naked fest’ (evidence is cfnm fest at some Asia country like one of them is male naked fan dance in Japan, or holy bath Gangga river India), so you’re the 1 who get checkmate for your hypocrisy, until mom & daughter care their father, brother, and her son modesty first.

I forgot to said that I’m from Asia, and from what I know Europe is far more fair in this body equality issues, so Europe you should protect your beautiful equal culture from Asian mentality, okay!? Share!

I know difficult to have a change, this argument is my coping of my frustration, but I believe even if slow thing can change better to be more equal, so help me to share this!

Next article is about why me support topless equality, and the prejudice stereotype that pop up since I’m a male.

Nacktrodeln in Altenberg

1 Comment »

Mensrights female= sex negative feminism who hide in ‘mensrights’ to attack ‘free the nipple’ feminism?

Do you ever see a female who are against free the nipple (& called herself as “mensrights”- even though not all men who are in that group are against free the nipple since they know free the nipple give equality to general (to women) & to male too just from differ perspective, not in pervy senses by the way), yet this kind of ‘feminine modesty female’ keep ‘preaching’ & trying to lead people to think “If you’re mensrights then must be against topless equality”- a.k.a support double standard tradition with I found it funny, this kind of so called “pro men” female can (act) angry over gillette adv who claim men are predator yet she alone often preach that ‘real life unisex toilet is danger’ because “all men are potential rapist” or ‘free the nipple is impossible’ because “ALL MEN ARE ANIMAL WHO COULDN’T CONTROL HIMSELF, EVEN IF FREE THE NIPPLE ALREADY NORMALIZE” (never see some Europe part? Where topless equality is normalise & no big deal?), also play double standard objectification victim card “only angry if male able to see female nipple, yet never complain the reverse”. Straight to the point she is Sex Negative Feminism (opposite from body confidence feminism), and this female too obsessed with modesty, and gender role that’s why they okay too for shaming other female who are body confidence or other female who try to raise awareness of double standard slut shaming. The clever thing is this “mensrights female” hide behind “mensrights” so more ‘cloud’ a gullible people, share this for awareness. Anyway this topless equality picture to triggered people who are against us- the ball is in our hand, the body is yours so they really can’t do too much.

guy-topless-women-whip-vagina

a body part so tiny shouldnt cause riot 3

bwbypiecaae3dtl

topless great lesson te kids

topless together equality blurred

Leave a comment »

Top 5 reason why ‘Free The Penis’= ‘FREE THE VAGINA’ (dick/ cock= VULVA/ PUSSY). While breast= Men Nipple (SAME ANATOMY).

  1. penis= VAGINA, both are PRIMARY reproduction, both between legs & infront asses, and both for PEEING. while breast are SECONDARY reproduction just like adam’s neck.
  2. How if it’s reverse? when men just half or semi naked, I ask female to show her vagina or full frontal naked? feminist (sex negative type) also disagree right? so don’t be hypocrite.
  3. How if I said “she saw our men butt then men must see her vagina, it’s fair since both private” you get my point? you see the fallacy comparison? same when mainstream compared (NON-GENITAL) breast with dick (male GENITAL).
  4. Isn’t funny if penis – male genital (which bigger than v) can be seen or not taboo? even if erect? yet female genital/ vagina which is smaller is taboo? that’s why to get rid this biased compared penis with VULVA, ok?
  5. What’s next if you said “men see breast or ‘women half naked bottom on’ then women must able to see men fully frontal naked or topless + bottomless”, if we follow this fail mindset then ‘what’s next?’ if female then bottomless equally like the men, what’s next? women must able to see men orgasm? or female can touch penis at public just because men see vagina at public? you understand now?

Female have privilege by the way, they can easily ask the wrong comparison like “if women semi naked then men must full frontal naked, equal!”, mainstream will just follow and listen sex negative feminist hypocrisy, while men have no privilege to said the reverse like that. This biased factor one of them is caused by ‘topless inequality’ so free the Nipple!

Free The Nipple 17d17

nip equal nip while penis equal VAGINA 17d17

This pic above is normal just like when clothed female selfie with topless guy, period. the premis should be “why women can see guy’s nipple- one side only? then men should able to see topless women too” << this is CORRECT. The wrong 1 if we started asking guy to fully naked just because female half naked. If you want guy show penis then show VAGINA too, to be equal right?

Naked equality free the vag 17d17 (1)

LEARN Asian! Learn sex negative HYPOCRITE feminist! Learn sexist religious people! Learn Mid East .. at least first learn hair will not make guy become animal rapist (except if you want to believe that).

Leave a comment »

It possible for normal topless equality at public

People who live other than Europe place-like Asia, usually have solid double standard mentality when it come to public nudity or public dress code between sexes. I disagree (& honestly piss off) when a group of friend (for example) have a male friend that change cloth like topless seen by women, and it’s count “perfectly fine” yet the reverse a female friend change shirt (even if still covered nipple-bra on) seen by men-is count as “objectification” (because male can see it) or “inappropriate” (because it’s a women that change shirt), this is unfair, more worse sometime in that friendship a guy can change his jeans too-seen by women at public context, even the more more worse during like hiking trip always a there’s 2 or 3 guy full naked-change clothed, also can seen by women, this is contrast remembering for women just change shirt with bra on seen by her male friend at public context already “taboo”. Unfair for both sexes, for men: it’s always “unokay” if guy see his opposite sex body in non sexual context yet it’s always okay for female even if she see more (male) skin, and for women: she always get slut shame for just show a little bit skin when a guy can even almost naked, and nobody shame him. That’s why even if I like in friend zone, doing activity, I choose to quit because tired see unfairness of dress code.

Sorry, little bit personal expression to release something from my chest. now.

People in Asia or southeast asia or even at middle east, always perceived that topless equality is impossible, one reason I always hear like “yeah I’ll horny just see women with bra on now you want to topless?”…my respond to that is off course you will think like that because in your society even just seeing cleavage or bra-on-shirt-off can become a big deal-continuously consistent tell people that guy “inappropriate” for seeing female skin at public (even if guy already freely release female curiosity by topless all the time), and tell girl “inappropriate” for her show skin equally like men…you know born, and live in that kind of culture, educated since kid, especially when never see  Europe make us think like that-by default. If we live in place that bra-on-shirt-off is no big deal like U.s you’ll view bra-on is fucking normal-screw people who make big deal over bra-on, and if you live in a place were topless equality is normalize like some Europe, you’ll realize: men can confirm with it, know the context, will see that as normal human bodies, and female who choose to topless is because she confidence of her bodies, nothing “trying to seduce” like Asia or Religious people love to excused!

..Even if somehow some guy can get boner but if he know the right context because free the nipple already a culture in his society-nothing wrong with that, it possible-I’ll come to this.

Now you’ll ask me “Where’s the evidence? because you must be deluded”.

This will (hopefully if you’re open minded) change your view.

Evidence topless equality possible 7717 (1)

Long life EuropeEvidence topless equality possible 7717 (2)

Respect for EuropeEvidence topless equality possible 7717 (4)

Hat off for EuropeEvidence topless equality possible 7717 (5)

I feel grateful Europe ladies exist-my respect (*this is not “pervert” expression like Asia or religious people love to excused)OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

My holiday destination is obvious Europe for their nudity equality-sick of nudity inequality in AsiaEvidence topless equality possible 7717 (7)

Thanks for all guy in photos-they show men-can-confirm-with-itEvidence topless equality possible 7717 (8)

Thanks Europe for being the most open minded & correctEvidence topless equality possible 7717 (9)

Keep the equality EuropeEvidence topless equality possible 7717 (10)

Feel free to share, and feel free to cons or support me.

 

 

Leave a comment »

Hejab or Burqa = More Fanatic Form of Sex Negative Feminist

I know this topic is scandalizes as it sound, and probably my pro free the nipple friend upset why I wrote like this (because I know somehow even if you support free the nipple, you support muslim at the same time). I want to point out from male perspective how hejab is unfair to men too, give you insight why half population still believe it’s “womenrights”, and why this is not about banning rights to wear. I know it unfair to women side too-which I often hear from sex positive feminist, and I’m not denying- that just want to add from other perspective. So please let me talk openly in here. I just want to be myself, and speak what I thought important (and since this topic is not mainstream, I’m PROUD to be the first who point out this).

Before start I understand also about how men-who-pro-hijab-mentality act, this men forced women what to wear-I get it, and also they “help” to create culture that unfair to men too actually.

Do you ever wonder why even after Westerner Atheist point out why “Muslim holy book” is not compatible for women rights, it’s look like the argument didn’t affect them? there’s still numerous of women come to Islam (beside their born there)? why is it there’s even many women claim it’s for women rights? I will not said my background but I know very well what ladies-pro-hijab mentality look like. So by just saying “women must covered is misogyny”, is not enough (maybe only Westerner that get it but not hejab girl (hejabi) itself). you must understand how hijab girl perceived (I’m not said I know everything but pretty sure this speculation is mostly true-I have observed it for long time).

It is because pro hejab girl, or muslim women itself have a mentality of sex-negative-feminist. Basically think female bodies have more “dignity” than male bodies, dislike men can see women bodies at public-perceived it degrading (more worse every skin of female bodies want to be considered “inappropriate” if men see it), yet at the same time dislike if she get the equal reverse situation treatment (dislike if women prohibited seeing male bodies at public or if it count as inappropriate). So “Muslim holy book” is very compatible with them (even in Quran the double standard dresscode is more contrast) so they see this as an advantage for women. They more think it’s “good” since the double standard ideology is easy to considered normal in the name of religion- like in Middle East society (they like this), and this is religion so it will make people afraid to questioned it, and also the cumpolsary in Islam to spread their believe (syari’a) include this unfair dresscode rule (which make more easy to spread this hejabi believe) this explain why this typical women view this as “womensrights”. In addition this mentality is brought to sex also where usually most of the time it’s male bodies more exploited while female one more less exploited like: the hijabi can have their sex fantasy exploiting male anatomy until the maximum one (blowjob brutal cum fantasy-tasting with mouth) while the men (lesser exploiting her) even just touching her still lesser than when this hijabi taste him + often she full clothes (Hijab / Burqa) after hijabi get her fantasy of exploiting men while her “dignity” is “protected”, mainstream still said they “sacrifice” for men (what a Bullshit) but hejabi like it. and in their sex culture mostly status quo like this. They love this “dignity win” concept & they think they-female Win, that’s the reason they try to spread their believe to create ‘Its only objectification/ sexism if Men see/ touch it’ culture because they think all women win if like that- Like sex-negative-feminist but the more hardcore one. This is the only one that they really concerned that’s the reason they don’t care about 9 years old girl married, don’t care of honor killing for women, don’t care when women must sit behind men, don’t care when other women get acid in her face, don’t care four wives, and don’t care female genital mutilation (banned male genital mutilation too by the way) etc.

I disagree when this hardcore muslimah (female) try to forced their rule, and believe to everybody- especially when it’s about: men seeing female hair or leg at public is considered “porn”, “objectification”, & “degrade” women, even if it just at public beach (not even her husband can see it), while women okay to see men with underwear at beach (even if it not her husband), this is not a great equality I think. They tend & bold to complaining even for smallest little thing to public mainstream like demanding women who already full clothes to wear more wider clothes because they hate that men can still see women curved (yet silence when in same society men peeing uncovered at public-which is more worse). After this so called “good muslimah girl” watching Magic Mike at movie (looking at hot shirtless men) they come out to complain about “how only women are objectified, and degraded”, again mainstream just easily listen to them because of what’s called political correctness especially in the name of religion + sex negative feminist…

Yup, I know there’s sex positive women who think that if women must covered at public, and never get oral pleasure is unfair too-I understand that. I wrote this specifically to pro hejab girl, and sex negative feminist … believe me this kind of people will easily understand when I wrote like this, maybe Europe people difficult to get it since by default they never experience this + already open to nudity (so couldn’t see from this perception).

Last, I understand that their “holy book” have unfairness towards female side too which already speak often, and often again, I not denying that but nether less I want people to understand from my point of view too-that unfairness happen to both sexes in Quran, and I point out how it unfair from men perspective especially from my personal view. I support women’s rights what to wear or not to wear at public (what I mentioned is the double standard apply by mainstream which create unfairness in most middle east), and ideology of ‘unfair dresscode were everybody must submit’ is different from female rights to wear, please differentiate that. I didn’t want to against Muslim or something like that- this just point out the reason what I disagree on Mid-East culture, and it’s my rights to exercise my freedom of speech.

Hijab turkey 24417 wp

Hejab Sexist to both Sexes 25a17

 

 

2 Comments »

Amina imprison for 12 year is injustice !

So i heard the news about Amina that she was face 12 year imprison because she dare to bare chest at public. My short opinion about this-imprison for 12 year is, it already out of bounds. Yes the punishment was “overdose”.

From what i know about Muslim point of view about this is she was immoral because she break the taboo and Muslim people think she deserved high punishment. okey i know Muslim will get mad about this but every person have different point of view, so if Amina don’t agree and feel injustice by double standard Muslim law ,she feel oppresed and have the rights to voice out her point of view, you Muslim can’t think that she-Amina was 100 % wrong just because she don’t agree with Muslim’s law and feel free to give her heavy punishment. You take her freedom you know, imagine 12 year just because she bare chest. What freedom of speech did religion especially Muslim gave if every person that questioning Islam will automatically get heavy punishment. for me it is only way to barrier people from questioning Islam.

Also from what i know Muslim men always free even proud to expose their bodies at public (bare chest, pee whenever they see tree, strip male thief to naked etc) even at media (men’s body building show etc)because i have live in Muslim society for long time. I think it’s hypocrite you know If this Muslim men feel free and always expose their body at public but get mad when a women did it. Close your body too we are equal ! also to hijab women that feel free to see men’s bodies but get mad when the situation reverse. That’s hypocrite double standard and i will not sit idle here and act like this injustice was never happened.

amina
I’M BEHIND AMINA !!! FOR TRUE EQUALITY

Leave a comment »