Momotaro 69

The Limited Edition Of Crazyman In The World !

Gotopless 2019 Celebration- show Mainstream hypocrisy when angry to topless equality which actually give Equality for both sexes, and how it Possible (bonus : Pic Awareness (in Non -sexual context))

I.Mainstream hypocrisy

Mainstream who angrily against topless equality movement do prove an obvious hypocrisy (I still understand if some can see our equality point but still feel ‘not ready’ to face it), but there do exist a people/ group (like religious bigot/ of modesty type of feminism- the opposite of body confidence feminist) who loose their mind as fuck over free the nipple Yet at the same time show their obvious hypocrisy, for example:

This (hypocrite religious fanatics & modesty type of feminism) when they see:

A)Topless equality were men & women can topless fairly at public place (were women & men can see each other topless equally) = they (modesty type of feminism & religious bigot & media) loose their mind (as fuck), play ‘objectification’ victim card, forced to change other’s view etc.

B)Yet if it about ‘cfnm- male objectification’ public fest (which do exist)- were female shame for just ½ naked but men can even full frontal naked without get shame (*or from other perspective were men taboo & must feel guilt for just to see ½ naked female, Yet female can even see bunch of full naked men at fucking institution without get shame- contrast) = they (modesty type of feminism & religious bigot & media) never hear to be angry/ act like this is an isolated incidence (even some sex negative feminism try to defend it “Dude don’t forced your view haha”- hypocrisy). Here 1 example below:

GVAPA REVENGE OBRUN DO OBJECTIFIED MALE

How come they’re not angry to contrast cfnm (were guy will be shame for seeing just half naked female, yet female liberated to see full naked guy at public place), yet angry as fuck with topless equality (both can seen each other top equally for God sake!)

II.Topless Equality give equality to women & men (from differ perspective):

1)For women: women will not get slut shame for topless (just like no one shame men for topless at public), sometime mom must do breastfeeding at public, if a guy will be consider as good guy even if he fucking topless all the time (were I don’t want to see it) then in the name of fairness don’t labelled female as “bad girl” just because you dislike it/ if she alone choose to topless.

2)For men: men will able to see breast from different perspective (that is natural perspective). Also if girl can  free to see/ admire topless male, then why men will be shame for seeing female topless in non sexual context? Why men must only see female top as”porn”?

IM NOT LET IT LIKE 17 APRIL 2016

III.It Possible

A)Look at some Europe place (or, other like old Bali civilization- before force ly banned by prudish & sex negative feminism) they have female toplessness,, and it’s normal (or – if at Europe – they even have female full nudity in non sexual context at public, and no big deal *remember men also often topless/ naked there too okay), and this all example show that it’s no big deal (since already seen as normal thing) & rape is Not higher if compared in other society which have strict dresscode for women. So yeah people who against us like to said “how about rape? Haha checkmate” when at other place there’s a ‘male & female topless sliding race’ at public with no problem at all.

Hidden Captivating Open Normal Some Will Said

Not Equal With Full Naked

Old Bali Not Sexual Possible

STATS PROVE US NO CORRELATION W MODESTY

Sure men in Europe can still attracted to breast but it called ‘admiring’ – which natural not sexually crazily obsessed because you taboo it & make it fetish like at Asian/ Japanese, or even Mid East society. Here some article made by female professional psychologist that point out “why male learn to fetish breast & not biologically fetish it, and men able not to obsessed crazily to breast if normalize”

MEN ARENT HARDWIRE OF BREAST

IV.Genital=genital (not anything else)

Penis=Vagina (both are primary reproduction that located between our leg & infront our asses, and for peeing too), how if I said “since women can see topless men all the time, so men have rights to see female Vagina + bonus her buttcrack at public, equal”- you’ll easily disagree right? it goes both way.

MY SIMPLE QUESTIONED TO PEOPLE WHO SAID FREETHEDICK

Also Breast have same anatomy ‘breast tissues’ with Male Chest!

Legal Illegal

So here the rest of some topless equality photos in non sexual context. Happy gotopless 2019 day! Topless equality! Keep solid as team!

Kylie with her men 2 GREAT SUCCESS

Mislead1

 

Leave a comment »

Some Topless Equality Photos Example (which show you from other perspective that it Possible)

Male admire female upper form is not objectification- just like female admire hot Korean topless actor, Female who body confidence to topless is not “slut”- just like when men topless all the time, it possible, look at this example evidence, even the 1 who you think fucking ludicrous to happen like big size breast is actually fucking possible – you who never live in topless equality place so by default easily perceived big size breast as “very offensive”. This is real equality: male & female seeing each other opposite sexes upper part in non sexual context at public equally is equal (how come only men derided as “sexist who objectified female”? you sex negative hypocrite feminist- like female never admire & photos shirtless guy).

Sex negative feminist try to mock this truth idea, so I repeat it again: THE MORE IT HIDDEN THE MORE IT CAPTIVATING, actually no significant different between us, if guy live at some Europe place where topless equality is normalize- yes guy can still attracted but it called admire, different from “obsessed crazily” since never see it like Mid east guy! Same if toplessness of male are make very strict-taboo all the time, when it reveal some female will probably more attracted curious to see/ scandalize, just like at 1930s (if I’m not wrong) were at U.s guy must covered his nip at beach, then 1 men show his nip at beach, and female curious to see the situation (maybe she couldn’t erect but they still show sign of curiosity, get it?).

Also some “macho” guy, and sex negative feminism so obsessed with ‘female modesty only that need to be protected’ til they scared when some guy wear “male bra” at football legal sport, Lol. They should know that it tech use to measure fitness level, but even if it just male bra, come on why should act like really difficult to accept male who want to – by himself – choose to cover his nip? “Oh here are the danger bla bla bla, so men must proudly show his nip to female” said sex negative feminist (then I imagine if reverse “Oh mind your own business, you mean try to lecture me on feminism? You are male! I’ll tell other girl to covered”…. hypocrisy).

Other thing is when it is an Asian martial art legal sport competition somehow we all perceived “offensive for female to wear (even just) a bit revealing custom (seen by male eyes)- she must very modest “Omg we record the competition for tv you know!? how if (just) cleavage of girl seen by men!? objectification, crime” (when female eyes bystander audience alone even very free to see ‘men wear sexy underwear’ only at sumo legal sport + feel free to laugh at male sumo wardrobe malfunction which do happen- off course they care wardrobe malfunction only if happen to women, right Asia mentality??), yet in my confusion then I saw West mma sport, and that perception of ‘equal dresscode is impossible, must apply gender role’ mentality suddenly just gone, we can see from different – open minded, equal – perspective: mma female fighter for example wear 2 piece sport clothes (& men wear modest enough bottom part too, so more balance, not too contrast like unfair sumo custom who only dare to ‘objectified’ men), so it possible for dresscode equality, it sport science (Europe science always better than Asia culture pseudoscience), no big deal, men able to know the context, women not “slut” for wearing that (again if audience can see West mma were the female & the male wear more balancing dress code, nothing wrong with that, so how come Asian feminist only think “Only female get objectified by male *since not as modest as what she want*”?).

1548343590795

D6Fx_hlXsAANoFl

D6Fx_hpWwAARwUe

DDxLbdOW0AAz96d

DFvZXu5XgAA178n

DH9c49pW0AAObdr

DI4-GZnW0AAAZza

Screenshot_20180810-232433

Leave a comment »

‘Female form seen by male’ is always perceived impossible/ offensive (than if the sexes were reverse), until it truly be done (i.e Europe)

Have you ever heard something sound like “Female topless? You’re crazy! Female upper part is different, I can’t imagine if the big breast pop up at public, I’m really mad!”

So when male upper part vs female upper part, they compared it size…(even though there’s female with flat chest, and male with big nip…

…it’s funny since if we talk about human bottom part: male genital are far bigger than female genital (Vagina- small) but never hear people said “Omg, male genital can erect you know? It’s more offensive if penis at public than vagina”, mainstream even don’t care if there’s an erect male genital (penis) at public (while – small – vagina not shown). So if they don’t bother the comparison size of genital, why they do compare between male chest & female chest?

…Okay back to the excused from the mainstream, When I once support topless equality in Asia here, when sex negative modesty feminism  argue like that, I once confused, I thought “Yeah it seem impossible.. it seem offensive”, then I see Europe (yes, not all Europe suddenly show topless female at public- but Europe do different they have more place i.e beach or festival were female topless at public in non sexual context (equally with male), and even if the breast are big in shape it normal, no big deal, and possible), so in Europe we can see it as ‘make senses’ (especially now many body confidence female raise awareness on topless equality too by exercising topless at public garden, topless experiment at day street etc- with no big deal happen, guy able to know the context, and make it more normalize), while if we in “Asian/southasia atmosphere” it seem fucking offensive/ impossible/ we can’t think it without big deal happening in here.

…But difficult to explain to Asia/ southasia people since even just hear ‘freethenipple’ word most of them already loose their mind..

…Now Asia people still can understand female in bikini at pool is fucking possible/ no offensive at all, bring ‘bikini’ word to middle east atmosphere, and Mideast people will get mad just like when Asian get mad over ‘topless’ word (but we know bikini can exist at Asia, and Topless equality can exist at part of Europe), so the same to breast if normalize in Asia society – people can just accept it just like bikini…(but off course I know to change culture it take progress which can have a risk at beginning)…but still show equality is possible to be achieve.

The same apply on movie censorship in my place, it’s always male nudity that more be ‘objectified’ with no censor at movie theater, they said “We are different”..it confused me for a while (I still know it unfair if ‘objectified male semi nudity only more frontally’ but) I doubt can movie legally show male nip vs female nip fairly, male buttcrack vs female buttcrack equally? The answer is yes! See Korean adult legal movie (a story which have sex scene on it) they do only censored genital equally (not like other who only dare to objectified penis while protect vagina modesty), they show female nip & male nip + female buttcrack vs male buttcrack fairly (not like other who only objectified male buttcrack & male nip at movie), after see that korean movie i realize ‘equality in anatomy’ fucking possible (why I think it impossible- till I watch that korean 18+ movie).

It’s a religious bigot & sex negative feminism who try to play ‘impossible’ mindset, and they depend on “look at our culture, if can- it already happen in the past” this excused… even in the past- my culture have female semi nudity in non sexual context at public too actually, very normal at that time… till they (sex negative feminism, prudish tourist, religious government) who are the one who forced it to be banned (till it seem very taboo now, and we must be like “here we go again explaining it possible”)…

NOT FORGOT HV CUNNI 24519

Korea show cunnilingus by guy scene too (not like other who by pc cult only dare to show blowjob scene aka ‘always only dare to show male anatomy get objectified by female senses’ scene).

Screenshot_20190523-140235_Gallery

Korean adult movie show female nip equally (not always objectified male nip like other does)

Screenshot_20190523-140636_Gallery

Show that it fact female can have sexual feeling too on men bodies (opposite from sex negative feminist claim)

STRIP UNDIE 24519

Korean adult movie is the fairest, have scene were handsome male strip undie/ pants of female too (not like other who by pc cult only dare to show scene were ‘only guy are humiliated get strip down by female’). They even show what true anatomy equality is by censored only genital fairly (so people understand penis= Vagina)

….

“Sumo costum is impossible to be equal, they said” well a German legal sport festival were female & male topless + bottom on equally at public they never said…

Naked Snow-Sledding Competition In Saxony

Nacktrodeln in Altenberg

 

Leave a comment »

Big size breast=/= couldn’t have free the nipple (& genital=genital aka penis=VAGINA)

About mainstream who thought “female topless at public is fucking taboo, I can’t imagine if it happen! Look some size is big so now porn come at public, huh?” something sound like this (especially Asia, religious, conservative, or prudish society). That kind of perception will easily & strongly pop up if you live at society who never have free the nipple/ were breast is taboo at public. This kind of perception is subjective, if you live at some part of Europe were female nipple/ breast is just normal as a male nipple- that kind of perception will not/ lesser to happen (no matter what size or shape the breast is), so to claim free the nipple (topless equality) is impossible just by your own subjective perception is invalid. Yes, I do know it not easy to be accepted at society who have culture “only female modesty need to be protected, while men not” thing, The society need to hv female topless regulary in non sexual context (by her own will off course) just as regular as the male one then it can be seen as something normal (but again not easy if the minority not try to atleast satire our mainstream, and do need process, *and in some society like Mid-east it more difficult maybe in free the nip process can have many victim at first- since even hair is problematic there, so therefore for me mid-east learn to accept female hair first, okay?).

Look it funny how majority of (ignorance) people can said “if female ½ naked & show non genital nipple (which male do already show his too), then don’t get mad if male fully naked & show male genital”- biased & funny because they don’t angry if ‘female can see male nip + His genital + bonus male butt too aka she can see male fully naked at public’ yet outrage as fuck if it’s about ‘male can see (just) female’s (non genital) nip (only- were female ass + her genital still fully protected) aka male just seeing female ½ naked (only- not to forgot female already see male topless all the time too’). Basically just imagine if reverse in a parallel world were men couldn’t topless, female prohibit to see topless male & men fight for his rights to topless suddenly some girl bottomless (so male can see it)…you see my point? it goes both way… the same if you compared fully exposed frontal naked male with just 1/2 naked female it biased.

Finally having equality doesn’t mean other gender should get more right? (female finally can have same topless equality as men does without need to slut shaming fairly & male can see breast in more natural way – so not curious/ obsessed anymore – just like female have rights to see male shirtless without need to feel guilty & male do can accustomed with it- seeing topless female in more nature way) doesn’t mean when we already get this (topless) equality suddenly we should create a new double standard again.

Other shitty thing from mainstream, feminine modesty female, sex negative feminist girl, religious group, legal political correctness media (like sexist Bbc shit) is whenever it about the contrast public festival were ‘male fully naked seen by female- were the female not even ¼ naked’= normal day “why should angry” thing Yet when it’s about equality were male & female can see their opposite sexes ½ naked fairly= suddenly gender issues of “only female get objectified by evil male eyes”.

IMG_20180608_110710

Leave a comment »

Bridal Shower Party In Asia Only Objectified Male Genital aka ‘Penis Cake Only’, Where’s Vagina Cake??

Why Asia Bridal Shower only have male genital – penis – cake (or toy) for bussiness / advert / public party? even have ‘cum-penis’ cake, and  ‘male genital being “played” by female (senses)’ cake. Yet no single vagina cake at all? Wtf? Penis= VAGINA (not anything else).

Breast? how if reverse, for example I said “male butt cake already equal with vagina cake”

More ‘objectified’ male since people more dare to make penis cake for sell at bridal shower / business (than female genital cake).

Yes it’s small thing but my rights to speak up honestly, and if you said small then WHY IT’S BIG DEAL FOR YOU TO SHOW VAGINA CAKE ON BRIDAL SHOWER??? ESPECIALLY CUM PENIS CAKE ARE VERY COMMON???

MAKE FREE THE VAGINA CAKE , AND ‘CUNNILINGUS BY MEN’ CAKE TOO!!

Share this article, or memes for awareness!!!

IMG-20180327-WA0007

IMG-20180327-WA0014

dAVID PART 2 18117

Taiwan sexist-to-men-bj-snack-4-girl (1)-tile

IMG-20180225-WA0000

IMG-20180327-WA0008

Only penis that’s okay to be”objectified” legally for money? where’s vagina cake, vagina pao, vagina toys for bridal shower???

SHARE if you agree for awarenesss!

Leave a comment »

Asia Misandry: toilet, male urinal that can easily be seen from outside, and female janitor that can enter men toilet.

As a men I disagree with ‘male urinal (peeing place) that can easily be seen from outside public’ (specifically in Asia region – I’m more fine with Europe since they apply equality, Europe have the reverse too: female urinoir), I also disagree when female janitor/ staff can easily enter men toilet.  If you ask why, it is because in Asia if the situation were reverse – example female version of urinal/ other female room that can be seen from outside public, or if men janitor can enter female toilet – it will be seen as “offensive”, so it’s double standard. This have unfairness to men too like ‘it only sexist if men see his opposite sex peeing activity’ (yet “ok” if reverse), or ‘it only sexist if men enter his opposite sex bathroom’ (yet “ok” if reverse). Other thing is if male seeing female activity when peeing easily considered by mainstream that “female already been degrade by men” then why the reverse ‘female who see male peeing’ (coincidentally or not) is not fairly considered as ‘degraded male’ too? If you said “no women peeping” my answer is: you fear men can peeping hence your objection is ‘men will SEE his opposite sex peeing’ right? then a female janitor enter male room, or male urinal that can easily be seen from outside public is also about ‘Female can SEE her opposite sex pee’ even if it’s accidentally but the essential is SAME, and who knows if there’s a female that happy can easily see men peeing at public toilet? So either both have equal privacy, or both are okay to see each other peeing. by the way I often accidentally see men underwear, or even men butt/ peeing dick at male toilet (even if i try not to see it), so no excused like “Oh female will not see anything”.

Bonus topless equality photos (before you accused me as “sexist” remember ‘men shirtless already exposed all over media even the legal one) so the premis should be ‘why women can see men topless yet men will derided as sexist?’, also from other perspective ‘why men can topless without being labelled even if his purpose is for show his chest muscle? yet women will easily get pressure, and labelled negatively if she confidence to topless in non sexual context’. Stop double standard based by sexes, yes probably you still said that this double standard is somehow justified as “equal”, but I tell you my friend ‘double standard is double standard’ period.

This just topless like a male ok (2)

This just topless like a male ok (3)

This just topless like a male ok (4)

 

Leave a comment »

Top 5 reason why ‘Free The Penis’= ‘FREE THE VAGINA’ (dick/ cock= VULVA/ PUSSY). While breast= Men Nipple (SAME ANATOMY).

  1. penis= VAGINA, both are PRIMARY reproduction, both between legs & infront asses, and both for PEEING. while breast are SECONDARY reproduction just like adam’s neck.
  2. How if it’s reverse? when men just half or semi naked, I ask female to show her vagina or full frontal naked? feminist (sex negative type) also disagree right? so don’t be hypocrite.
  3. How if I said “she saw our men butt then men must see her vagina, it’s fair since both private” you get my point? you see the fallacy comparison? same when mainstream compared (NON-GENITAL) breast with dick (male GENITAL).
  4. Isn’t funny if penis – male genital (which bigger than v) can be seen or not taboo? even if erect? yet female genital/ vagina which is smaller is taboo? that’s why to get rid this biased compared penis with VULVA, ok?
  5. What’s next if you said “men see breast or ‘women half naked bottom on’ then women must able to see men fully frontal naked or topless + bottomless”, if we follow this fail mindset then ‘what’s next?’ if female then bottomless equally like the men, what’s next? women must able to see men orgasm? or female can touch penis at public just because men see vagina at public? you understand now?

Female have privilege by the way, they can easily ask the wrong comparison like “if women semi naked then men must full frontal naked, equal!”, mainstream will just follow and listen sex negative feminist hypocrisy, while men have no privilege to said the reverse like that. This biased factor one of them is caused by ‘topless inequality’ so free the Nipple!

Free The Nipple 17d17

nip equal nip while penis equal VAGINA 17d17

This pic above is normal just like when clothed female selfie with topless guy, period. the premis should be “why women can see guy’s nipple- one side only? then men should able to see topless women too” << this is CORRECT. The wrong 1 if we started asking guy to fully naked just because female half naked. If you want guy show penis then show VAGINA too, to be equal right?

Naked equality free the vag 17d17 (1)

LEARN Asian! Learn sex negative HYPOCRITE feminist! Learn sexist religious people! Learn Mid East .. at least first learn hair will not make guy become animal rapist (except if you want to believe that).

Leave a comment »

Get rid your double standard of trying to change culture which have female nudity (or non nudity like topless female) in it, while 180 degree change when it’s about a culture which have male nudity in it..that’s hypocrite.

Mainstream, and media should stop their double standard or they hypocrisy political correctness. When it’s about male nudity at public- everybody love to said “it’s culture, period” yet when it’s about female nudity or even just non nudity (half naked) like topless ness (which I never considered topless women as naked since they just topless like men)- everybody love to act like somehow it’s “wrong”, and the culture need to be change. That’s also what media like facebook, youtube, and instagram love to do (lead mainstream think oppositely base by gender), if you observed their censorship is not really fair- not just about nipple.

Instagram for instant an unclear pic of vagina- that’s painted is automatically no questioned must be censored, yet i experience instagram wouldn’t remove pic of 3 naked guy were their penis is shown uncensored. I speculate this is because instagram ‘think’ it’s “small”/ or 1 out of 3 dick is “unclear”. This show hypocrisy from ig. (*I have the evidence were the pic of naked guy not removed at all- since I’m little bit tired today maybe next I’ll edit this & input the evidence pic).

Again this is unfair to men (& women) from different perspective. It’s considered “inappropriate” if guy see pic of female pure form in non sexual context- guy must see it only in porn – yet female more tolerated seeing male pure form. It also sexualize female bodies, and reduced the equal opportunity of confidence female to nude or just topless in non sexual context. And that double standard in what considered “objectification”- men bodies even already naked for viewer- never count as objectification while female bodies even just semi nudity will easily count “object” thing, which create biased when counting number of objectification between the sexes. That’s why sex negative feminist can more easy playing their victim “objectification” card.

Either both sexes can see their opposite sexes topless equally at public, either both can topless fairly at public or both prohibited. Either culture which have female nudity should not be forced to change – just like when people ignorance towards cult which have male nudity, or both must be change equally. Get rid double standard that’s my motto ’69’ 😉

By the way penis=VAGINA (both genital between leg, and infront ass), while your hairy chest=breast (both have nipple- same anatomy)

Topless Equality 4 true Equality 151117 (3)

Leave a comment »

If we live in society were free the nipple is normal, no matter the shape & size-we’ll see breast differently (more natural) rather than just can only see it in porn (fetish it). Add reminder-genital equality: Vagina=Penis.

If we live in society that open to ‘free the nipple’, have ‘topless equality’ lesson, and already often to see female topless just like men at many public place in that society-in non sexual context. No matter what size, and shape of breast, what colour is it, we’ll not fetish (obsessed sexually) to it (‘fetish’ example are like when people whose society never have a free the nipple, act & perceived in fetish way when see the breast-shape because only see it in porn for sexual purpose), if normalize we’ll get used to it-maybe at some point some guy can still get boner but already know the right context (if he have boner but know the right context, and just walk without disturb her-nothing wrong with that), evidence are many place in Europe especially at beach were it show guy can accustomed by it, other evidence is old Bali (before religious government, and missionary tourist forced them to follow their mindset) topless equality in Bali in 1930s are just a piece of cake for them to apply (when we who live here think it must be a big deal).

Breast fetish come from only see it in porn (1)

Credit: @ToplessNewYork (twitter)

Breast fetish come from only see it in porn (2)

Credit: @ToplessNewYork (twitter)

Breast fetish come from only see it in porn (3)

Credit: @ToplessNewYork (twitter)

Breast fetish come from only see it in porn (4)

Credit: @ToplessNewYork (twitter)

DAxH5uqVoAQr9J9

Credit: @ToplessNewYork (twitter)

If normalize at public no matter the size or shape of breast, we will see it differently (more natural) rather than – just only can see it in porn way.

Sex negative feminist as usual excused something like this (like their always do) “Why you exposed your bodies for male eyes, it degrade you!” my answer is: women do attracted to hot shirtless guy too (other thing is if guy always covered his nipple at public place, I’m sure women more attracted when suddenly see topless male) so why female can see hot shirtless guy, and nobody said “guy why exposed your dignity, female can see it”, double standard isn’t because it two opposite respond from mainstream based by gender when actually it’s the exact same behaviour, and it’s subjective too-women who feel that way can choose to covered but not all women have same view like you, and it’s rights for women whose open minded, and want to free the nipple to do it-if she have confidence (in non sexual context) without getting slut shame.

Some people whom because of this double standard (topless inequality) habits norms, fails to see the different between bottomless-full-naked-guy, and topless-half-naked-bottom-on-female…Vagina=Penis (both primary reproduction, both between legs, both genital), and nipple=nipple (both have n-i-p-p-l-e, same anatomy), you also easily understand if I said “Too much topless men, then men must able to see vagina at public” right? other thing is even if penis is larger than vagina, even penis can erect longer, while vagina is smaller- we still apply equality right? nobody said “vagina can be freely exposed because smaller, while penis is larger so it must be sacred” no double standard perform to genital right? both (even with different size) still treated equally right? so the same goes to nipple-average women nipple have more fat in it but let’s apply equality either both nipple okay to show or both prohibited at public, and like I said free the nipple is possible.

Other thing that really piss me off is often mainstream & media hypocrite as fuck: they outrage to just half-naked-bottom-on-female with excused “breast are larger than male chest” yet in other day they just laugh seeing full-naked-bottomless-guy even if penis larger than vagina-they never said (so ‘bottom on topless women seen by guy’ already outrage them, but not ‘bottomless full naked male seen by female eyes’?).

Leave a comment »

Let Educate Ourself of Naked Equality by Enjoying PICO Art Performance

I don’t know you guys, but some people love to think fully naked men with semi naked women as “equal”, which for me is stupid, they think semi naked women is naked-fallacy, fully naked women is the true equivalent of fully naked men, this video of naked equality art festival will raise you awareness of nude equality, enjoy 😉

Leave a comment »