“O Only Female (Nudity) been Exposed at Public/ Tv”= is a Myth, We need more Free The Nipple, and at other Free The Vagina.

Hi All, this is continuation from my previous post.

I realize that mainstream of people often difficult to be ‘one tone’ with my movement who active in protesting ‘Why only male nudity that been “objectified” in more frontal way, or in more family rating way if at legal scene/ public’ – one of them is because they have a believe (perception) that “female public nudity more easy to happened therefore only women bodies are objectified”, which is completely biased (I know at Europe we easy to find female nudity but at same society they easily to have public male nudity too – said Wnbr were you can see naked female but the men naked too at public right?).

What I want to focus is mostly on Asia region (and Southeast Asia) were I will said that society claim on ‘only female nudity that been objectified’ is a Myth (at least been biased), the right one is (again): ‘only male nudity that been objectified in more frontal way, or in more family rating way if at legal scene/ public – mostly if at Asia’ (Sure some cult at West country probably have some place were male nudity been more dominated too, & also I’m talking in this nowadays era).

So here’s my back up:

1. Asia (atleast Southeast Asia) Society tend to over caring female modesty only if at public.

Asian bystander will ‘only protect/ cover in rush if it’s female who (even just) partial naked at street (even if she did it willingly)- let alone full naked female. But they less care to protect male modesty even if he naked at street (let alone just a semi naked guy).

2. Southeast Asian often only dare to stripped male criminal only at public (if he catched red handed)

If there’s a male thief who steal just a ‘less worth thing’ like ‘chicken thief at village’- he can still be beaten harshly by iron, stripped semi naked/ even frontal naked, worse burn alive publicly (let alone if he do big criminal), Yet even a female pedophile (on boy victim) will probably just got ‘anger shout’ by mob (so let alone if she just steal at market).

By the way female can feel free to beat up male thief, shout for him to be burn alive, or even share a photos, or video of naked men thief beaten in blood at public on facebook for her own satisfication (imagine if reverse – it’s a Southeast Asian men who beat semi naked female thief, and share publicly at Fb.. you know what happen so double standard.. hypocrisy).

3. Male nudity can exist at ‘fam rating crowded public place’ at Asia

Only male frontal nudity (or at least almost naked male – who exposed his full buttcrack) who can been exposed at legal entertainment/ crowded ‘fam- rating’ public place at Asia (I never see the reverse situation, usually female nudity only done individually by exhibitionist, & at non-crowded area, or once exist but already extinct since mainstream got upset/ outrage).

A. Tattoo contest at legal crowded area were ‘only male almost naked show his full buttcrack’.

Why? because female nudity do more taboo at Asia.

B. ‘(Bunch of) male (almost) naked only’ dance entertainment at Wedding party.

If male who naked dance = “atleast his penis couldn’t be seen, case close haha” (yeah see above photos were male not coincidentally show his genital & female audience started laugh hard).

If it’s a female who naked dance = “Omg objectification of female, she already full naked, you know she can wardrobe malfunction & show her vagina right!? look her buttcrack already been exposed, banned!”, or, “why only happen to female? I’ll try my best to challenge it” (*This is kind of a comment that I always face, some screenshot by me), like this below:

C. Male nudity at Legal court at ‘religious prudish country’

Show me a case were “female naked at legal court in prudish religious country in Asia”? by the way this instagram screenshot below is an another evidence that ‘mainstream of people perfectly fine if it’s (“objectification” of) male public nudity- even if already at court at religious country’

D. (Young) Male student naked show only at High school Graduation day

If you claim “always female nudity”, then show me case were only female student who dance semi nude at high school in Asia, can you?

Society will excused – if it objectification of male semi nudity at this nude fan dance – “O why so serious? at least his penis will not be seen haha” (even if wardrobe malfunction do can happen & show accidentally his ‘virgin student’ penis), yeah imagine if the sexes were switch it’s a female high school student only who dance nude = “Omg how can fully naked women dance at graduation day!? her butt crack can be seen! how if she wardrobe malfunction and show her vagina? it’s at high school for God sake”

D. The Contrast yet frontal objectification one of male nudity at Crowded Public Asia (*(fully) clothed female, (Fully Frontal) Naked Male)

From 3A-3C point above is not yet full frontal but worse thing is ‘objectification’ of male frontal nudity also exist too. This include the two worse unfair ‘contrast’ Cfnm at South Asia i.e Holy bath at India, and ‘male college streak’ (both case bunch of young male full nude, and kid & teen can watch legally).

Remember: very contrast- since ‘female can see (bunch of) men frontal naked at crowded public area in prudish Southasia’ vs ‘male not (even just) see female (partial) nudity- yet she even fully clothed’

This happen at prudish religious country who claim more modest than West.

Worse 1 of them is held by legal institution who always lecturing us to “stop objectify women”

***Which sometime hidden (ly) include Underage nude male student run streak (who knows)

4. Teen (puber) boy nudity more “family rating”

We all know how outrage mainstream are over (just only) teen puber girl ‘upper’ half nudity, right? “Omg! her puber breast can be seen by men, jail all the 1 who responsible for this!” (let alone if the girl bottomless)

but off course if the gender were reverse – a teen puber boy (even if he already fully naked/ bottomless at public indoor, worse already exposed his puber erect) = Everybody pretend it’s a “normal” day (include modesty type of feminine feminist, politician, legal media, cyber police you name it).

5. Only Asian Female who can Grab Penis of naked men publicly & got away with it

The reverse situation would be f*cking offensive

Asian girl couldn’t resist – when they come to Europe – to took selfie with naked men at public, even dare to grab penis during public selfie (we as Asian guy often afraid to do the reverse situation ‘grab pussy of nude female publicly’, since we know how anger Asia feminism will be).

Yes there do exist some feminine type of female who think their gender “win” if only ‘her modesty protected’, or ‘revenge objectification’ (even if objectification of naked male bodies already exist long time before her great grandmother were born).

Bonus screenshot below (Compared yourself with above), below: A young Asian female (who live probably at Malay) loose her mind at chat over (just only) idea of “female half nudity” (aka ‘male & female can see each other opposite sex’s upper part equally’) so let alone if “female full frontal naked” (/ Cmnf idea right?), but you see (above photos) since it’s Cfnm (even if already truly exist like evidence above) = suddenly that anger’s from Asian prudish feminism ‘thrown out of a windows’.

Actually she (below screenshot) also already angry over just bikini idea at f*cking swimming pool on prudish country. O how hypocrite feminine (modesty type of) feminism can be (so support only body confidence feminist).

6. [Yup this number six just about male semi nudity but] Only okay if men & teen boy wear almost naked custom at legal sport in Asia, just because of mantra word “sumo”

The reverse would be problematic if at Asia legal sport right?

You can said there’s other sport were female show more skin, yes, but it not so contrast as sumo 1 you know? (male can still topless/ wear speedo there, and female not ‘almost naked’ like sumo – at the sport example you mentioned right?)

More

7. [Western edition] A guy naked at Airport= normal day, A female naked at Airport= Problematic

7. ‘Male naked pan show’ (or other similar male almost naked show thing) at West talent show do exist right? (usually female only till bikini- not almost naked at this kind of show, even that already problematic enough).
8. Reminder: penis=VAGINA (Deal with it).

Stop tricky comparison by comparing female partial nudity with full frontal naked men for your own agenda, hypocrite.

“Female nudity more common” = IS A MYTH, It’s Male Nudity who been ‘Objectified’ in more Frontal Way, or more Fam Rating, or more easily happen at Crowded Area in Asia society. Sorry feminine (modesty type of) feminist, you couldn’t lie for your narrative agenda anymore.

O SHARE THIS ARTICLE to the Rest of the WORLD.

 

Asian female nudity still more taboo (than the men 1)

I as an Asian guy – I bit upset since if it come to semi nudity/ even nudity public streak- most of them only “objectified” Asian male nudity (/ male semi nudity) while female form modesty always been more protected (than the male 1) because of our tradition biased thinking i.e semi naked men show at wedding fam rating place (here) *female nudity often only at adult indoor place.

Other thing is Asian feminine girl/ modesty type of Asian feminism piss me off- they are hypocrite since easily whining & loose their mind over just bikini public show (or worse complaining as f*ck just over slightest little thing like cleavage of clothed female), they play “objectification” victim card, shame & make men feel guilt for just seeing bit of skin, also shame body confidence female, try to make it taboo… Yet every time it reverse in sexes even more worse i.e male semi naked public show= they never complain & even act oppositely.

If this Asian mentality come to Europe= same, you’ll mostly see the same pattern – more Asian guy only who naked i.e that Got talent show were men “objectified himself” almost naked to entertainment Asian modesty feminist at (fam rating) tv show, or at Wnbr. This because they biased mindset “It’s only okay if men form that been exploit more frontally at public place”,& “Female modesty only that need to be care- not men, not boy” (sumo for example exploit boy publicly at legal sport). I wish equality either both modest equally, or both not- but you know Asian mentality= difficult already..

Above just 1 example, to be honest I’m sick already seeing male nudity only that been exploit more frontally/ more fam rating at here, so I do put big effort to facing stress whenever need to give evidence of what I said (male nudity).

I still feel grateful some body confidence Asian girl come to West- to express herself: show form in non sexual context at public (Ok, some exhibitionist guy, & feminine feminist start to think “What? female form in non sexual context? what a bullshit”- it not a bullshit, if you see Europe when there’s nudity public fest, beside the male nudity, there always a female full form too, and guess what? because already normal there guy do able to control himself, yes maybe can still got boner- but do know the right context).

And this kind of body confidence Asian girl is the 1 who do give real balance, true equality!- not that hypocrite feminine modesty Asian girl who only care girl modesty at public while ignored our boys!

Here some photos of kind of Asian girl that I respect (No, not in “pervy” way like you try to potrait, but more of because tired of Asian male nudity/ semi only that often I saw publicly).

Very rare to see Asian girl full naked at Wnbr so hat off to this Asian ladies above.

Below is just a non naked (1/2 naked) topless ladies, take easy Asian mentality- it normal just like topless men at public, this pic already prove us ‘female form in non sexual context = possible’ thanks Europe! (Imagine if we listen to Mideast mentality, Asian mentality, Japanese mentality *on nudity- not others, okay? = we’ll never realize female form can be seen in natural way!). By the way half naked female= half naked male, full naked male= full naked female, and penis=VAGINA

Topless Equality do Exist (& possible)

Public topless equality do possible, and at legal cartoon too. Learn from Europe – maybe you can said “Well not all Europe have free the nipple, you mor*ns!” – but if we compared Europe with Asia / Southeast Asia / Mid East: It do show Europe are have Topless Equality far more numerous than strict prudish Asia (get it?) & Again if Europe have topless equality, then it actually possible if we have a will (O and in legal cartoon too).

By the way check out my ‘topless equality picture’ pages- I have some update too.

Gotopless 2019 Celebration- show Mainstream hypocrisy when angry to topless equality which actually give Equality for both sexes, and how it Possible (bonus : Pic Awareness (in Non -sexual context))

I.Mainstream hypocrisy

Mainstream who angrily against topless equality movement do prove an obvious hypocrisy (I still understand if some can see our equality point but still feel ‘not ready’ to face it), but there do exist a people/ group (like religious bigot/ of modesty type of feminism- the opposite of body confidence feminist) who loose their mind as fuck over free the nipple Yet at the same time show their obvious hypocrisy, for example:

This (hypocrite religious fanatics & modesty type of feminism) when they see:

A)Topless equality were men & women can topless fairly at public place (were women & men can see each other topless equally) = they (modesty type of feminism & religious bigot & media) loose their mind (as fuck), play ‘objectification’ victim card, forced to change other’s view etc.

B)Yet if it about ‘cfnm- male objectification’ public fest (which do exist)- were female shame for just ½ naked but men can even full frontal naked without get shame (*or from other perspective were men taboo & must feel guilt for just to see ½ naked female, Yet female can even see bunch of full naked men at fucking institution without get shame- contrast) = they (modesty type of feminism & religious bigot & media) never hear to be angry/ act like this is an isolated incidence (even some sex negative feminism try to defend it “Dude don’t forced your view haha”- hypocrisy). Here 1 example below:

How come they’re not angry to contrast cfnm (were guy will be shame for seeing just half naked female, yet female liberated to see full naked guy at public place), yet angry as fuck with topless equality (both can seen each other top equally for God sake!)

II.Topless Equality give equality to women & men (from differ perspective):

1)For women: women will not get slut shame for topless (just like no one shame men for topless at public), sometime mom must do breastfeeding at public, if a guy will be consider as good guy even if he fucking topless all the time (were I don’t want to see it) then in the name of fairness don’t labelled female as “bad girl” just because you dislike it/ if she alone choose to topless.

2)For men: men will able to see breast from different perspective (that is natural perspective). Also if girl can  free to see/ admire topless male, then why men will be shame for seeing female topless in non sexual context? Why men must only see female top as”porn”?

III.It Possible

A)Look at some Europe place (or, other like old Bali civilization- before force ly banned by prudish & sex negative feminism) they have female toplessness,, and it’s normal (or – if at Europe – they even have female full nudity in non sexual context at public, and no big deal *remember men also often topless/ naked there too okay), and this all example show that it’s no big deal (since already seen as normal thing) & rape is Not higher if compared in other society which have strict dresscode for women. So yeah people who against us like to said “how about rape? Haha checkmate” when at other place there’s a ‘male & female topless sliding race’ at public with no problem at all.

Sure men in Europe can still attracted to breast but it called ‘admiring’ – which natural not sexually crazily obsessed because you taboo it & make it fetish like at Asian/ Japanese, or even Mid East society. Here some article made by female professional psychologist that point out “why male learn to fetish breast & not biologically fetish it, and men able not to obsessed crazily to breast if normalize”

IV.Genital=genital (not anything else)

Penis=Vagina (both are primary reproduction that located between our leg & infront our asses, and for peeing too), how if I said “since women can see topless men all the time, so men have rights to see female Vagina + bonus her buttcrack at public, equal”- you’ll easily disagree right? it goes both way.

Also Breast have same anatomy ‘breast tissues’ with Male Chest!

So here the rest of some topless equality photos in non sexual context. Happy gotopless 2019 day! Topless equality! Keep solid as team!

 

Some Topless Equality Photos Example (which show you from other perspective that it Possible)

Male admire female upper form is not objectification- just like female admire hot Korean topless actor, Female who body confidence to topless is not “slut”- just like when men topless all the time, it possible, look at this example evidence, even the 1 who you think fucking ludicrous to happen like big size breast is actually fucking possible – you who never live in topless equality place so by default easily perceived big size breast as “very offensive”. This is real equality: male & female seeing each other opposite sexes upper part in non sexual context at public equally is equal (how come only men derided as “sexist who objectified female”? you sex negative hypocrite feminist- like female never admire & photos shirtless guy).

Sex negative feminist try to mock this truth idea, so I repeat it again: THE MORE IT HIDDEN THE MORE IT CAPTIVATING, actually no significant different between us, if guy live at some Europe place where topless equality is normalize- yes guy can still attracted but it called admire, different from “obsessed crazily” since never see it like Mid east guy! Same if toplessness of male are make very strict-taboo all the time, when it reveal some female will probably more attracted curious to see/ scandalize, just like at 1930s (if I’m not wrong) were at U.s guy must covered his nip at beach, then 1 men show his nip at beach, and female curious to see the situation (maybe she couldn’t erect but they still show sign of curiosity, get it?).

Also some “macho” guy, and sex negative feminism so obsessed with ‘female modesty only that need to be protected’ til they scared when some guy wear “male bra” at football legal sport, Lol. They should know that it tech use to measure fitness level, but even if it just male bra, come on why should act like really difficult to accept male who want to – by himself – choose to cover his nip? “Oh here are the danger bla bla bla, so men must proudly show his nip to female” said sex negative feminist (then I imagine if reverse “Oh mind your own business, you mean try to lecture me on feminism? You are male! I’ll tell other girl to covered”…. hypocrisy).

Other thing is when it is an Asian martial art legal sport competition somehow we all perceived “offensive for female to wear (even just) a bit revealing custom (seen by male eyes)- she must very modest “Omg we record the competition for tv you know!? how if (just) cleavage of girl seen by men!? objectification, crime” (when female eyes bystander audience alone even very free to see ‘men wear sexy underwear’ only at sumo legal sport + feel free to laugh at male sumo wardrobe malfunction which do happen- off course they care wardrobe malfunction only if happen to women, right Asia mentality??), yet in my confusion then I saw West mma sport, and that perception of ‘equal dresscode is impossible, must apply gender role’ mentality suddenly just gone, we can see from different – open minded, equal – perspective: mma female fighter for example wear 2 piece sport clothes (& men wear modest enough bottom part too, so more balance, not too contrast like unfair sumo custom who only dare to ‘objectified’ men), so it possible for dresscode equality, it sport science (Europe science always better than Asia culture pseudoscience), no big deal, men able to know the context, women not “slut” for wearing that (again if audience can see West mma were the female & the male wear more balancing dress code, nothing wrong with that, so how come Asian feminist only think “Only female get objectified by male *since not as modest as what she want*”?).

‘Female form seen by male’ is always perceived impossible/ offensive (than if the sexes were reverse), until it truly be done (i.e Europe)

Have you ever heard something sound like “Female topless? You’re crazy! Female upper part is different, I can’t imagine if the big breast pop up at public, I’m really mad!”

So when male upper part vs female upper part, they compared it size…(even though there’s female with flat chest, and male with big nip…

…it’s funny since if we talk about human bottom part: male genital are far bigger than female genital (Vagina- small) but never hear people said “Omg, male genital can erect you know? It’s more offensive if penis at public than vagina”, mainstream even don’t care if there’s an erect male genital (penis) at public (while – small – vagina not shown). So if they don’t bother the comparison size of genital, why they do compare between male chest & female chest?

…Okay back to the excused from the mainstream, When I once support topless equality in Asia here, when sex negative modesty feminism  argue like that, I once confused, I thought “Yeah it seem impossible.. it seem offensive”, then I see Europe (yes, not all Europe suddenly show topless female at public- but Europe do different they have more place i.e beach or festival were female topless at public in non sexual context (equally with male), and even if the breast are big in shape it normal, no big deal, and possible), so in Europe we can see it as ‘make senses’ (especially now many body confidence female raise awareness on topless equality too by exercising topless at public garden, topless experiment at day street etc- with no big deal happen, guy able to know the context, and make it more normalize), while if we in “Asian/southasia atmosphere” it seem fucking offensive/ impossible/ we can’t think it without big deal happening in here.

…But difficult to explain to Asia/ southasia people since even just hear ‘freethenipple’ word most of them already loose their mind..

…Now Asia people still can understand female in bikini at pool is fucking possible/ no offensive at all, bring ‘bikini’ word to middle east atmosphere, and Mideast people will get mad just like when Asian get mad over ‘topless’ word (but we know bikini can exist at Asia, and Topless equality can exist at part of Europe), so the same to breast if normalize in Asia society – people can just accept it just like bikini…(but off course I know to change culture it take progress which can have a risk at beginning)…but still show equality is possible to be achieve.

The same apply on movie censorship in my place, it’s always male nudity that more be ‘objectified’ with no censor at movie theater, they said “We are different”..it confused me for a while (I still know it unfair if ‘objectified male semi nudity only more frontally’ but) I doubt can movie legally show male nip vs female nip fairly, male buttcrack vs female buttcrack equally? The answer is yes! See Korean adult legal movie (a story which have sex scene on it) they do only censored genital equally (not like other who only dare to objectified penis while protect vagina modesty), they show female nip & male nip + female buttcrack vs male buttcrack fairly (not like other who only objectified male buttcrack & male nip at movie), after see that korean movie i realize ‘equality in anatomy’ fucking possible (why I think it impossible- till I watch that korean 18+ movie).

It’s a religious bigot & sex negative feminism who try to play ‘impossible’ mindset, and they depend on “look at our culture, if can- it already happen in the past” this excused… even in the past- my culture have female semi nudity in non sexual context at public too actually, very normal at that time… till they (sex negative feminism, prudish tourist, religious government) who are the one who forced it to be banned (till it seem very taboo now, and we must be like “here we go again explaining it possible”)…

Korea show cunnilingus by guy scene too (not like other who by pc cult only dare to show blowjob scene aka ‘always only dare to show male anatomy get objectified by female senses’ scene).

Korean adult movie show female nip equally (not always objectified male nip like other does)

Show that it fact female can have sexual feeling too on men bodies (opposite from sex negative feminist claim)

Korean adult movie is the fairest, have scene were handsome male strip undie/ pants of female too (not like other who by pc cult only dare to show scene were ‘only guy are humiliated get strip down by female’). They even show what true anatomy equality is by censored only genital fairly (so people understand penis= Vagina)

….

“Sumo costum is impossible to be equal, they said” well a German legal sport festival were female & male topless + bottom on equally at public they never said…

 

Propaganda of sex negative feminist, and religious bigot make anatomy comparison more unfair, and contrast

I just want to tell about sexist situation that seem nonsense/ peculiar but it happen, in past in this society –  were I live in – when I was younger, it’s normal for a girl wear two piece of swimsuit (modest/ not) at swimming pool (remember: men are also wear underwear/ boxer seen by a female at pool, so stop play victim card hypocrite sex negative feminism), so bare in mind that it’s very normal at pool for men & women to see their opposite sexes wear suit in non sexual context at pool (no big deal). Other thing in past is it’s normal if cleavage seen/ show at tv (remember: men are also topless at tv very often, so you can’t play victim sex negative feminism – I know as advocate of topless equality for me ‘topless female= topless male’, but for the sake of mainstream people who don’t understand topless equality, so let assump “bra top= topless guy”- for this sake of article only), so bare in mind for audience to see topless male and cleavage (/ bra top) is perfectly normal- nobody take it seriously, no actress nor actor nor audience take it seriously (nonsense to angry over shirtless guy or cleavage, right?).

Now time flies, and now you’ll notice the change in our society: (only) female who even wear full clothed suit even if already at pool (while the guy wear short as usual), now (only) female who will be censored strictly if at tv even (just) over a cleavage- clothed female, and yes now people will perceived this as “normal”, and claim this as “our real culture, stupid!” especially our newest generation. So now ‘female see male shirtless wear boxer at pool or tv’= “okay”, yet if reverse ‘a guy see female wear 2 piece swimsuit even if already at pool’= “Omg, so you make this article to objectified female? I’m disgust with pervert like you, I will protect my female modesty!”- something like this (playing victim) by our new generation. Conclusion ‘it’s only sexist if men see it’ cult, and ‘objectification only bad if happen to female’ mentality.

There’s other worse case, once I complain why only male full buttcrack can be ‘objectified’ at 13+ rating movie here (when the reverse even if already at 21+ movie- female buttcrack will be cut/ censored strictly)? No respond from authority (several time I speak.. tired to give so much effort with negative respond from authority & mainstream), yet when a religious (hejabi) feminist complain over local youtube advert about a (Clothed) girl band (who still wear double layer + covered top & bottom) who this hejabi somehow perceived as “naked”, guess what? The authority fucking respond, they check it whether the complain is right (probably we hope the authority then laugh at this right? But no) they give  an official warning to the organizer who make the advert, or other new worse case thing here: management of local “disney” here can covered just a topless female mermaid statue, again statue.. while at our local tv channel sometime show more frontal/ vulgar M-a-l-e nudity/ semi nudity with nobody angry, contrast right?

This happen because – my biggest speculation – a religious bigot, and a sex negative ‘hypocrite’ feminist propaganda which get responded by an elite of tv (for applying “it only sexist if men see it” cult, or “objectification only bad if happen to female” mentality). In past people of that generation can fully understand that 2 piece of swimsuit= male wear short, now if you ask new generation, they will accussed us as “digusting pervert”, and start play “objectification” victim card (as sex negative feminine feminist teach/ propaganda). Difficult to make a change religious bigot & sex negative feminist already win this brainwashing.

I forgot that this not only give unfairness to male, but to female too! A body confidence girl will easily be shame as “whores” for choosing to be different from religious modesty obsessed female. She will get peer pressure from her surrounding.

I must be honest most female here are sex negative feminist that have mentality like “yeay, female win we can see male shirtless at public while guy couldn’t even see us with bra top at pool, haha”- hypocrite selfish thinking like that. Okay they (sex negative feminine hypocrite feminist) will give excused like “female must more covered because men can rape & harass, while no men harass/ rape victim at all!” (then think she win by this), my answer is: yes, most rape/ harass happen to female- although many enough male victim of rape/ harass too (even by female predator) which unfortunately people don’t give a fuck, but it fallacy to mix this up.. you see- Europe never listen this kind of ‘modesty hypocrite obsessed girl’, and thanks to Europe they make us realize that ‘men will not rape just because female wear bikini at pool’, or female wear bikini at pool is normal, imagine if we listen to this bast*rd sex negative feminism and become like Mideast- we’ll never realize that society such as Europe can exist.

Once a female angry to me “Just because female see topless men at public doesn’t mean female objectified you, get it!!!!” now if she said that ‘female see male shirtless doesn’t mean objectification’ the same can be apply to the reverse, it goes both way! A guy see female in bikini at pool is not objectification too (worse at same time that girl try to convince me that ‘male see female cleavage even at pool, even if the guy not think dirty is still “degraded women” such a hypocrite), okay maybe you will reply “But female get rape or harass, you understand, while women never rape nor harass a male” (I already answer on above paragraph) but my other reply is: how about a guy who don’t harass, nor rape but happen at pool & see female in bikini???

“O how if your daughter wear bikini seen by other guy, huh!? Checkmate! Hahaha” First bikini is normal at pool, secondly: a mother also never care his son wear short, or even naked seen by female bystander eyes at public for ‘male (objectification) only naked fest’ (evidence is cfnm fest at some Asia country like one of them is male naked fan dance in Japan, or holy bath Gangga river India), so you’re the 1 who get checkmate for your hypocrisy, until mom & daughter care their father, brother, and her son modesty first.

I forgot to said that I’m from Asia, and from what I know Europe is far more fair in this body equality issues, so Europe you should protect your beautiful equal culture from Asian mentality, okay!? Share!

I know difficult to have a change, this argument is my coping of my frustration, but I believe even if slow thing can change better to be more equal, so help me to share this!

Next article is about why me support topless equality, and the prejudice stereotype that pop up since I’m a male.

Girl Just changing upper part shirt= Outrage, yet Guy Even changing bottom part jeans= normal day, Hypocrisy by Asia feminine feminist & Religious society.

So Asian Religious society ( + Feminine feminist domination) is making double standard dresscode more contrast everywhere they go. Once I playing futsal with my religious friend, then some of them started changing jeans at public, and I ask myself this is a country (& more over my friend is from religious background) who often whining telling a – clothed – female to be more modest even over just a cleavage/ leg, which mean society will more outrage if female changing upper part shirt leaving bikini top only right? yet the guy can even exposed his bottom part underwear (Bottom part > upper part). When I ask the cliche reply is “we still not naked”- true but female changing shirt is still more modest than you changing bottom part jeans but somehow a female who change upper part shirt publicly is count as “inappropriate” even if she’s not naked. Second cliche he gave “This is all male”- err no many female too. I’m not here telling to be modest or immodest, I just point out doublestandard that create by religious bigot + feminine hypocrite feminist, I want euality like at Europe/ Latin- anatomy equality dresscode at public, not like Asia.  Share my message.

Hejab or Burqa = More Fanatic Form of Sex Negative Feminist

I know this topic is scandalizes as it sound, and probably my pro free the nipple friend upset why I wrote like this (because I know somehow even if you support free the nipple, you support muslim at the same time). I want to point out from male perspective how hejab is unfair to men too, give you insight why half population still believe it’s “womenrights”, and why this is not about banning rights to wear. I know it unfair to women side too-which I often hear from sex positive feminist, and I’m not denying- that just want to add from other perspective. So please let me talk openly in here. I just want to be myself, and speak what I thought important (and since this topic is not mainstream, I’m PROUD to be the first who point out this).

Before start I understand also about how men-who-pro-hijab-mentality act, this men forced women what to wear-I get it, and also they “help” to create culture that unfair to men too actually.

Do you ever wonder why even after Westerner Atheist point out why “Muslim holy book” is not compatible for women rights, it’s look like the argument didn’t affect them? there’s still numerous of women come to Islam (beside their born there)? why is it there’s even many women claim it’s for women rights? I will not said my background but I know very well what ladies-pro-hijab mentality look like. So by just saying “women must covered is misogyny”, is not enough (maybe only Westerner that get it but not hejab girl (hejabi) itself). you must understand how hijab girl perceived (I’m not said I know everything but pretty sure this speculation is mostly true-I have observed it for long time).

It is because pro hejab girl, or muslim women itself have a mentality of sex-negative-feminist. Basically think female bodies have more “dignity” than male bodies, dislike men can see women bodies at public-perceived it degrading (more worse every skin of female bodies want to be considered “inappropriate” if men see it), yet at the same time dislike if she get the equal reverse situation treatment (dislike if women prohibited seeing male bodies at public or if it count as inappropriate). So “Muslim holy book” is very compatible with them (even in Quran the double standard dresscode is more contrast) so they see this as an advantage for women. They more think it’s “good” since the double standard ideology is easy to considered normal in the name of religion- like in Middle East society (they like this), and this is religion so it will make people afraid to questioned it, and also the cumpolsary in Islam to spread their believe (syari’a) include this unfair dresscode rule (which make more easy to spread this hejabi believe) this explain why this typical women view this as “womensrights”. In addition this mentality is brought to sex also where usually most of the time it’s male bodies more exploited while female one more less exploited like: the hijabi can have their sex fantasy exploiting male anatomy until the maximum one (blowjob brutal cum fantasy-tasting with mouth) while the men (lesser exploiting her) even just touching her still lesser than when this hijabi taste him + often she full clothes (Hijab / Burqa) after hijabi get her fantasy of exploiting men while her “dignity” is “protected”, mainstream still said they “sacrifice” for men (what a Bullshit) but hejabi like it. and in their sex culture mostly status quo like this. They love this “dignity win” concept & they think they-female Win, that’s the reason they try to spread their believe to create ‘Its only objectification/ sexism if Men see/ touch it’ culture because they think all women win if like that- Like sex-negative-feminist but the more hardcore one. This is the only one that they really concerned that’s the reason they don’t care about 9 years old girl married, don’t care of honor killing for women, don’t care when women must sit behind men, don’t care when other women get acid in her face, don’t care four wives, and don’t care female genital mutilation (banned male genital mutilation too by the way) etc.

I disagree when this hardcore muslimah (female) try to forced their rule, and believe to everybody- especially when it’s about: men seeing female hair or leg at public is considered “porn”, “objectification”, & “degrade” women, even if it just at public beach (not even her husband can see it), while women okay to see men with underwear at beach (even if it not her husband), this is not a great equality I think. They tend & bold to complaining even for smallest little thing to public mainstream like demanding women who already full clothes to wear more wider clothes because they hate that men can still see women curved (yet silence when in same society men peeing uncovered at public-which is more worse). After this so called “good muslimah girl” watching Magic Mike at movie (looking at hot shirtless men) they come out to complain about “how only women are objectified, and degraded”, again mainstream just easily listen to them because of what’s called political correctness especially in the name of religion + sex negative feminist…

Yup, I know there’s sex positive women who think that if women must covered at public, and never get oral pleasure is unfair too-I understand that. I wrote this specifically to pro hejab girl, and sex negative feminist … believe me this kind of people will easily understand when I wrote like this, maybe Europe people difficult to get it since by default they never experience this + already open to nudity (so couldn’t see from this perception).

Last, I understand that their “holy book” have unfairness towards female side too which already speak often, and often again, I not denying that but nether less I want people to understand from my point of view too-that unfairness happen to both sexes in Quran, and I point out how it unfair from men perspective especially from my personal view. I support women’s rights what to wear or not to wear at public (what I mentioned is the double standard apply by mainstream which create unfairness in most middle east), and ideology of ‘unfair dresscode were everybody must submit’ is different from female rights to wear, please differentiate that. I didn’t want to against Muslim or something like that- this just point out the reason what I disagree on Mid-East culture, and it’s my rights to exercise my freedom of speech.

 

 

Sexist Toilet

You know i’m sick of my society because of their sexism acceptance, and one of them is about toilet

In my society like a mall you will find some of them put janitor room (cleaning room) in male toilet but that’s not problem, the problem is a female cleaning service can enter the men’s bathroom for cleaning purpose cause the janitor room’s inside male bathroom. If this female cleaning service enter male’s toilet during closed is still okay but this women (if they wish) can also enter when it still open where men are peeing and tolerated by my society, this PISS ME OFF. I don’t say this happen to all toilet but I have experience this several times like it’s okey for this women cleaner to enter male bathroom.

I remember when a feminist outrage on television about men disrespect women if that men enter female’s toilet and as usual society agree with that but WHY when the situation reverse female entered male’s bathroom is likely to be tolerated?

Most people on my society always agree that men who enter ladies toilet are perveted or sex offender no excuse for that but in reverse situation female that enter men’s toilet ?huh they always have an excuse for that women to enter. This double standard make me sick.

Well i don’t really know if there’s also janitor room on ladies toilet but assuming that men cleaner can also enter ladies toilet because there’s a janitor room what will he see? This

And in reverse situation if women entered male’s toilet what will She saw? this

Get It? Male’s bathroom have an urinal place means it have bigger chance to see “bird” if that female cleaner enter male toilet than vice versa.

And the worse is i also saw at some placed like cafee they put the urinal placed openly on corner, at first i thought “is this is real?” but fucking shit that was real because that mothefucker (whoever the fuck that made this) think this is cool if men piss openly and can be seen by women around there (because women never wrong and always innocent so it’s always okey) like all men species must learn to bravely exposed their body to women PUBLICLY! THIS is INJUSTICE, THIS is SEXISM towards MEN!!!! And I REFUSES to COMPLY!!!!!

Look, If this KIND of sexism happens towards women it’s easy to protest look train or bus for women only.

But if that sexism favor a women like in this case no matter how hard i explain i will be derided as sexist, people around me will say “oh that’s a small case why you get angry?” reverse the situation and they will think that’s a big issues….Funny.