Momotaro 69

The Limited Edition Of Crazyman In The World !

Gotopless 2019 Celebration- show Mainstream hypocrisy when angry to topless equality which actually give Equality for both sexes, and how it Possible (bonus : Pic Awareness (in Non -sexual context))

I.Mainstream hypocrisy

Mainstream who angrily against topless equality movement do prove an obvious hypocrisy (I still understand if some can see our equality point but still feel ‘not ready’ to face it), but there do exist a people/ group (like religious bigot/ of modesty type of feminism- the opposite of body confidence feminist) who loose their mind as fuck over free the nipple Yet at the same time show their obvious hypocrisy, for example:

This (hypocrite religious fanatics & modesty type of feminism) when they see:

A)Topless equality were men & women can topless fairly at public place (were women & men can see each other topless equally) = they (modesty type of feminism & religious bigot & media) loose their mind (as fuck), play ‘objectification’ victim card, forced to change other’s view etc.

B)Yet if it about ‘cfnm- male objectification’ public fest (which do exist)- were female shame for just ½ naked but men can even full frontal naked without get shame (*or from other perspective were men taboo & must feel guilt for just to see ½ naked female, Yet female can even see bunch of full naked men at fucking institution without get shame- contrast) = they (modesty type of feminism & religious bigot & media) never hear to be angry/ act like this is an isolated incidence (even some sex negative feminism try to defend it “Dude don’t forced your view haha”- hypocrisy). Here 1 example below:

GVAPA REVENGE OBRUN DO OBJECTIFIED MALE

How come they’re not angry to contrast cfnm (were guy will be shame for seeing just half naked female, yet female liberated to see full naked guy at public place), yet angry as fuck with topless equality (both can seen each other top equally for God sake!)

II.Topless Equality give equality to women & men (from differ perspective):

1)For women: women will not get slut shame for topless (just like no one shame men for topless at public), sometime mom must do breastfeeding at public, if a guy will be consider as good guy even if he fucking topless all the time (were I don’t want to see it) then in the name of fairness don’t labelled female as “bad girl” just because you dislike it/ if she alone choose to topless.

2)For men: men will able to see breast from different perspective (that is natural perspective). Also if girl can  free to see/ admire topless male, then why men will be shame for seeing female topless in non sexual context? Why men must only see female top as”porn”?

IM NOT LET IT LIKE 17 APRIL 2016

III.It Possible

A)Look at some Europe place (or, other like old Bali civilization- before force ly banned by prudish & sex negative feminism) they have female toplessness,, and it’s normal (or – if at Europe – they even have female full nudity in non sexual context at public, and no big deal *remember men also often topless/ naked there too okay), and this all example show that it’s no big deal (since already seen as normal thing) & rape is Not higher if compared in other society which have strict dresscode for women. So yeah people who against us like to said “how about rape? Haha checkmate” when at other place there’s a ‘male & female topless sliding race’ at public with no problem at all.

Hidden Captivating Open Normal Some Will Said

Not Equal With Full Naked

Old Bali Not Sexual Possible

STATS PROVE US NO CORRELATION W MODESTY

Sure men in Europe can still attracted to breast but it called ‘admiring’ – which natural not sexually crazily obsessed because you taboo it & make it fetish like at Asian/ Japanese, or even Mid East society. Here some article made by female professional psychologist that point out “why male learn to fetish breast & not biologically fetish it, and men able not to obsessed crazily to breast if normalize”

MEN ARENT HARDWIRE OF BREAST

IV.Genital=genital (not anything else)

Penis=Vagina (both are primary reproduction that located between our leg & infront our asses, and for peeing too), how if I said “since women can see topless men all the time, so men have rights to see female Vagina + bonus her buttcrack at public, equal”- you’ll easily disagree right? it goes both way.

MY SIMPLE QUESTIONED TO PEOPLE WHO SAID FREETHEDICK

Also Breast have same anatomy ‘breast tissues’ with Male Chest!

Legal Illegal

So here the rest of some topless equality photos in non sexual context. Happy gotopless 2019 day! Topless equality! Keep solid as team!

Kylie with her men 2 GREAT SUCCESS

Mislead1

 

Leave a comment »

Some Topless Equality Photos Example (which show you from other perspective that it Possible)

Male admire female upper form is not objectification- just like female admire hot Korean topless actor, Female who body confidence to topless is not “slut”- just like when men topless all the time, it possible, look at this example evidence, even the 1 who you think fucking ludicrous to happen like big size breast is actually fucking possible – you who never live in topless equality place so by default easily perceived big size breast as “very offensive”. This is real equality: male & female seeing each other opposite sexes upper part in non sexual context at public equally is equal (how come only men derided as “sexist who objectified female”? you sex negative hypocrite feminist- like female never admire & photos shirtless guy).

Sex negative feminist try to mock this truth idea, so I repeat it again: THE MORE IT HIDDEN THE MORE IT CAPTIVATING, actually no significant different between us, if guy live at some Europe place where topless equality is normalize- yes guy can still attracted but it called admire, different from “obsessed crazily” since never see it like Mid east guy! Same if toplessness of male are make very strict-taboo all the time, when it reveal some female will probably more attracted curious to see/ scandalize, just like at 1930s (if I’m not wrong) were at U.s guy must covered his nip at beach, then 1 men show his nip at beach, and female curious to see the situation (maybe she couldn’t erect but they still show sign of curiosity, get it?).

Also some “macho” guy, and sex negative feminism so obsessed with ‘female modesty only that need to be protected’ til they scared when some guy wear “male bra” at football legal sport, Lol. They should know that it tech use to measure fitness level, but even if it just male bra, come on why should act like really difficult to accept male who want to – by himself – choose to cover his nip? “Oh here are the danger bla bla bla, so men must proudly show his nip to female” said sex negative feminist (then I imagine if reverse “Oh mind your own business, you mean try to lecture me on feminism? You are male! I’ll tell other girl to covered”…. hypocrisy).

Other thing is when it is an Asian martial art legal sport competition somehow we all perceived “offensive for female to wear (even just) a bit revealing custom (seen by male eyes)- she must very modest “Omg we record the competition for tv you know!? how if (just) cleavage of girl seen by men!? objectification, crime” (when female eyes bystander audience alone even very free to see ‘men wear sexy underwear’ only at sumo legal sport + feel free to laugh at male sumo wardrobe malfunction which do happen- off course they care wardrobe malfunction only if happen to women, right Asia mentality??), yet in my confusion then I saw West mma sport, and that perception of ‘equal dresscode is impossible, must apply gender role’ mentality suddenly just gone, we can see from different – open minded, equal – perspective: mma female fighter for example wear 2 piece sport clothes (& men wear modest enough bottom part too, so more balance, not too contrast like unfair sumo custom who only dare to ‘objectified’ men), so it possible for dresscode equality, it sport science (Europe science always better than Asia culture pseudoscience), no big deal, men able to know the context, women not “slut” for wearing that (again if audience can see West mma were the female & the male wear more balancing dress code, nothing wrong with that, so how come Asian feminist only think “Only female get objectified by male *since not as modest as what she want*”?).

1548343590795

D6Fx_hlXsAANoFl

D6Fx_hpWwAARwUe

DDxLbdOW0AAz96d

DFvZXu5XgAA178n

DH9c49pW0AAObdr

DI4-GZnW0AAAZza

Screenshot_20180810-232433

Leave a comment »

‘Female form seen by male’ is always perceived impossible/ offensive (than if the sexes were reverse), until it truly be done (i.e Europe)

Have you ever heard something sound like “Female topless? You’re crazy! Female upper part is different, I can’t imagine if the big breast pop up at public, I’m really mad!”

So when male upper part vs female upper part, they compared it size…(even though there’s female with flat chest, and male with big nip…

…it’s funny since if we talk about human bottom part: male genital are far bigger than female genital (Vagina- small) but never hear people said “Omg, male genital can erect you know? It’s more offensive if penis at public than vagina”, mainstream even don’t care if there’s an erect male genital (penis) at public (while – small – vagina not shown). So if they don’t bother the comparison size of genital, why they do compare between male chest & female chest?

…Okay back to the excused from the mainstream, When I once support topless equality in Asia here, when sex negative modesty feminism  argue like that, I once confused, I thought “Yeah it seem impossible.. it seem offensive”, then I see Europe (yes, not all Europe suddenly show topless female at public- but Europe do different they have more place i.e beach or festival were female topless at public in non sexual context (equally with male), and even if the breast are big in shape it normal, no big deal, and possible), so in Europe we can see it as ‘make senses’ (especially now many body confidence female raise awareness on topless equality too by exercising topless at public garden, topless experiment at day street etc- with no big deal happen, guy able to know the context, and make it more normalize), while if we in “Asian/southasia atmosphere” it seem fucking offensive/ impossible/ we can’t think it without big deal happening in here.

…But difficult to explain to Asia/ southasia people since even just hear ‘freethenipple’ word most of them already loose their mind..

…Now Asia people still can understand female in bikini at pool is fucking possible/ no offensive at all, bring ‘bikini’ word to middle east atmosphere, and Mideast people will get mad just like when Asian get mad over ‘topless’ word (but we know bikini can exist at Asia, and Topless equality can exist at part of Europe), so the same to breast if normalize in Asia society – people can just accept it just like bikini…(but off course I know to change culture it take progress which can have a risk at beginning)…but still show equality is possible to be achieve.

The same apply on movie censorship in my place, it’s always male nudity that more be ‘objectified’ with no censor at movie theater, they said “We are different”..it confused me for a while (I still know it unfair if ‘objectified male semi nudity only more frontally’ but) I doubt can movie legally show male nip vs female nip fairly, male buttcrack vs female buttcrack equally? The answer is yes! See Korean adult legal movie (a story which have sex scene on it) they do only censored genital equally (not like other who only dare to objectified penis while protect vagina modesty), they show female nip & male nip + female buttcrack vs male buttcrack fairly (not like other who only objectified male buttcrack & male nip at movie), after see that korean movie i realize ‘equality in anatomy’ fucking possible (why I think it impossible- till I watch that korean 18+ movie).

It’s a religious bigot & sex negative feminism who try to play ‘impossible’ mindset, and they depend on “look at our culture, if can- it already happen in the past” this excused… even in the past- my culture have female semi nudity in non sexual context at public too actually, very normal at that time… till they (sex negative feminism, prudish tourist, religious government) who are the one who forced it to be banned (till it seem very taboo now, and we must be like “here we go again explaining it possible”)…

NOT FORGOT HV CUNNI 24519

Korea show cunnilingus by guy scene too (not like other who by pc cult only dare to show blowjob scene aka ‘always only dare to show male anatomy get objectified by female senses’ scene).

Screenshot_20190523-140235_Gallery

Korean adult movie show female nip equally (not always objectified male nip like other does)

Screenshot_20190523-140636_Gallery

Show that it fact female can have sexual feeling too on men bodies (opposite from sex negative feminist claim)

STRIP UNDIE 24519

Korean adult movie is the fairest, have scene were handsome male strip undie/ pants of female too (not like other who by pc cult only dare to show scene were ‘only guy are humiliated get strip down by female’). They even show what true anatomy equality is by censored only genital fairly (so people understand penis= Vagina)

….

“Sumo costum is impossible to be equal, they said” well a German legal sport festival were female & male topless + bottom on equally at public they never said…

Naked Snow-Sledding Competition In Saxony

Nacktrodeln in Altenberg

 

Leave a comment »

Propaganda of sex negative feminist, and religious bigot make anatomy comparison more unfair, and contrast

I just want to tell about sexist situation that seem nonsense/ peculiar but it happen, in past in this society –  were I live in – when I was younger, it’s normal for a girl wear two piece of swimsuit (modest/ not) at swimming pool (remember: men are also wear underwear/ boxer seen by a female at pool, so stop play victim card hypocrite sex negative feminism), so bare in mind that it’s very normal at pool for men & women to see their opposite sexes wear suit in non sexual context at pool (no big deal). Other thing in past is it’s normal if cleavage seen/ show at tv (remember: men are also topless at tv very often, so you can’t play victim sex negative feminism – I know as advocate of topless equality for me ‘topless female= topless male’, but for the sake of mainstream people who don’t understand topless equality, so let assump “bra top= topless guy”- for this sake of article only), so bare in mind for audience to see topless male and cleavage (/ bra top) is perfectly normal- nobody take it seriously, no actress nor actor nor audience take it seriously (nonsense to angry over shirtless guy or cleavage, right?).

Now time flies, and now you’ll notice the change in our society: (only) female who even wear full clothed suit even if already at pool (while the guy wear short as usual), now (only) female who will be censored strictly if at tv even (just) over a cleavage- clothed female, and yes now people will perceived this as “normal”, and claim this as “our real culture, stupid!” especially our newest generation. So now ‘female see male shirtless wear boxer at pool or tv’= “okay”, yet if reverse ‘a guy see female wear 2 piece swimsuit even if already at pool’= “Omg, so you make this article to objectified female? I’m disgust with pervert like you, I will protect my female modesty!”- something like this (playing victim) by our new generation. Conclusion ‘it’s only sexist if men see it’ cult, and ‘objectification only bad if happen to female’ mentality.

There’s other worse case, once I complain why only male full buttcrack can be ‘objectified’ at 13+ rating movie here (when the reverse even if already at 21+ movie- female buttcrack will be cut/ censored strictly)? No respond from authority (several time I speak.. tired to give so much effort with negative respond from authority & mainstream), yet when a religious (hejabi) feminist complain over local youtube advert about a (Clothed) girl band (who still wear double layer + covered top & bottom) who this hejabi somehow perceived as “naked”, guess what? The authority fucking respond, they check it whether the complain is right (probably we hope the authority then laugh at this right? But no) they give  an official warning to the organizer who make the advert, or other new worse case thing here: management of local “disney” here can covered just a topless female mermaid statue, again statue.. while at our local tv channel sometime show more frontal/ vulgar M-a-l-e nudity/ semi nudity with nobody angry, contrast right?

This happen because – my biggest speculation – a religious bigot, and a sex negative ‘hypocrite’ feminist propaganda which get responded by an elite of tv (for applying “it only sexist if men see it” cult, or “objectification only bad if happen to female” mentality). In past people of that generation can fully understand that 2 piece of swimsuit= male wear short, now if you ask new generation, they will accussed us as “digusting pervert”, and start play “objectification” victim card (as sex negative feminine feminist teach/ propaganda). Difficult to make a change religious bigot & sex negative feminist already win this brainwashing.

I forgot that this not only give unfairness to male, but to female too! A body confidence girl will easily be shame as “whores” for choosing to be different from religious modesty obsessed female. She will get peer pressure from her surrounding.

I must be honest most female here are sex negative feminist that have mentality like “yeay, female win we can see male shirtless at public while guy couldn’t even see us with bra top at pool, haha”- hypocrite selfish thinking like that. Okay they (sex negative feminine hypocrite feminist) will give excused like “female must more covered because men can rape & harass, while no men harass/ rape victim at all!” (then think she win by this), my answer is: yes, most rape/ harass happen to female- although many enough male victim of rape/ harass too (even by female predator) which unfortunately people don’t give a fuck, but it fallacy to mix this up.. you see- Europe never listen this kind of ‘modesty hypocrite obsessed girl’, and thanks to Europe they make us realize that ‘men will not rape just because female wear bikini at pool’, or female wear bikini at pool is normal, imagine if we listen to this bast*rd sex negative feminism and become like Mideast- we’ll never realize that society such as Europe can exist.

Once a female angry to me “Just because female see topless men at public doesn’t mean female objectified you, get it!!!!” now if she said that ‘female see male shirtless doesn’t mean objectification’ the same can be apply to the reverse, it goes both way! A guy see female in bikini at pool is not objectification too (worse at same time that girl try to convince me that ‘male see female cleavage even at pool, even if the guy not think dirty is still “degraded women” such a hypocrite), okay maybe you will reply “But female get rape or harass, you understand, while women never rape nor harass a male” (I already answer on above paragraph) but my other reply is: how about a guy who don’t harass, nor rape but happen at pool & see female in bikini???

“O how if your daughter wear bikini seen by other guy, huh!? Checkmate! Hahaha” First bikini is normal at pool, secondly: a mother also never care his son wear short, or even naked seen by female bystander eyes at public for ‘male (objectification) only naked fest’ (evidence is cfnm fest at some Asia country like one of them is male naked fan dance in Japan, or holy bath Gangga river India), so you’re the 1 who get checkmate for your hypocrisy, until mom & daughter care their father, brother, and her son modesty first.

I forgot to said that I’m from Asia, and from what I know Europe is far more fair in this body equality issues, so Europe you should protect your beautiful equal culture from Asian mentality, okay!? Share!

I know difficult to have a change, this argument is my coping of my frustration, but I believe even if slow thing can change better to be more equal, so help me to share this!

Next article is about why me support topless equality, and the prejudice stereotype that pop up since I’m a male.

Nacktrodeln in Altenberg

1 Comment »

Girl Just changing upper part shirt= Outrage, yet Guy Even changing bottom part jeans= normal day, Hypocrisy by Asia feminine feminist & Religious society.

So Asian Religious society ( + Feminine feminist domination) is making double standard dresscode more contrast everywhere they go. Once I playing futsal with my religious friend, then some of them started changing jeans at public, and I ask myself this is a country (& more over my friend is from religious background) who often whining telling a – clothed – female to be more modest even over just a cleavage/ leg, which mean society will more outrage if female changing upper part shirt leaving bikini top only right? yet the guy can even exposed his bottom part underwear (Bottom part > upper part). When I ask the cliche reply is “we still not naked”- true but female changing shirt is still more modest than you changing bottom part jeans but somehow a female who change upper part shirt publicly is count as “inappropriate” even if she’s not naked. Second cliche he gave “This is all male”- err no many female too. I’m not here telling to be modest or immodest, I just point out doublestandard that create by religious bigot + feminine hypocrite feminist, I want euality like at Europe/ Latin- anatomy equality dresscode at public, not like Asia.  Share my message.

IMG_20180605_143335

IMG_20180717_173117

Leave a comment »

Why ‘topless equality’ can by default reduce ‘public nudity inequality’ that exist?

Many kind of ‘nudity inequality’/ ‘anatomy inequality’ that exist in this world, some of the example are like the “objectification” of male genital – penis only at most of U.s Tv (yet vagina protected by merkin), or In Asia their public nude festival usually only dare to more ‘exposing’ male nudity/ semi nudity (while female modesty somehow more protected) – like 1 of the worse is holy bath in India (were the bunch of male full frontal naked at public river yet female full clothed- contrast). Yes it exist some minor case in Asia were a female nude show happen at public- But in this era that end up very controversial/ scandalized if happen at public, while no scandalized when it come to male nude festival at public day.

Other example in sport- authority can broke their own custom regulation by allowing shy female to even cover her hair in sprint competition (even in professional competition) which mean also broke the ‘fairness’ during competition (the female participant not in same custom when compete) & also no science sport in allowing female wear hejab to compete with other (they’ll said “to inclusive shy girl for join sport so it’s okay”), yet if a shy guy didn’t want to show his chest during any competition that require him to topless- nobody will said “Okay we want to inclusive shy guy too” even mainstream will said “this already by sport science, this already by regulation, you think you’re smart want to broke the rule!? take it or leave it” (remember if it a female even just covered her hair can be consideration by legal professional authority, such a hypocrite this world is, why they not say  “female who want to be more covered is not allowed, this already by science, take it or leave it”), why always based by gender. Other example are if there’s a semi nude female at body festival in Asia- like female wear thigh bikini often the guy will be ‘more naked’ than the girl side (if in Asia)- he will show his buttcrack at same show, Etc.

stupid3

This kind of various ‘anatomy inequality’ mentality – that I show you above – can happen because (I speculate) one of the biggest root is cause by ‘topless inequality’. Female are require to covered her breast (& considered as “porn”) while men chest allowed to be seen by female (men only covered his bottom part). So by setting ‘female must covered more than men’ off course when we make nude festival, or create censor law by default majority of people will apply double standard (& doesn’t even realize that it’s unfair).

Even in a nudist people itself because of ‘topless inequality’ – some of them often biased (ly) compared partial naked women with full frontal naked men (you can see at some nudist account on twitter, they show penis but hide vagina because they’re being “cloud” by topless inequality- they forgot that breast is not genital). Hello? you claim you’re true nudist yet somehow you satisfied when ‘only male that truly naked’ while failed to see that topless women is just same as topless men, such a shame! some of them even ignorance to this double standard, I’ll not support a nudist who doesn’t understand that penis= VAGINA, I’ll only support nudist if they can understand that bottomless male= bottomless female, period.

So I think by straight focusing on topless equality awareness it’s very beneficial to reduce most of ‘anatomy inequality’/ ‘nudity unfairness’ that exist- it’ll reduce automatically since the problem already acknowledge (*if we success on topless equality, and majority want to be open minded + agree with us). Bringing topless equality can be efficient way than fighting unfairness that exist one by one (which okay too if somebody or some group choose to fight specific nudity unfairness that they disagree), for example if topless equality become a norm, and a nudist want to fight for nudity- they’ll not said a topless female as naked, they automatically know it just same like topless men.

I know most of you already laugh at me because bringing ‘topless equality’ idea (which I already point out the argument on many of my previous article, so just read it- I don’t want to waste time repeating the same thing I already wrote here- on why topless equality is a true equality & it possible).

The main benefit of raising topless equality is : people will not falsely compare ‘female semi nudity with male full nudity’ (which exist at some society like at Taiwan tattoo public contest- the male can be exposed almost naked like show his full buttcrack & not wear underwear- just small handkerchief covered dick, yet the female even still covered non genital nipple with big towel + wear underwear (somehow always female that more “modest”), most people there think this already “fair”). This is because they still not understand topless equality that’s why they falsely compared ‘1/2 naked female with full naked male’, bring topless equality awareness to them & in future they’ll not biased anymore. *I’m fine if Taiwanese comment to me that information that I get is not accurate because it mean can be “already equal” right? – but if my information is right, then the double standard that I mentioned is true (I have some evidence video but I not put it here since: 1) Seeing unfairness were only men anatomy that more ‘exposed’ make me stress- so nowsaday I try to avoid it, so my blood pressure is not high again, 2) Lazy to be perfectionist (only if really needed then I’ll show it).

At this time mainstream of people in this world still have mindset that an ‘almost naked male = “clothed” ‘, while ‘female in thigh bikini/ even sometime just show cleavage (in other society) = can somehow be perceived as “naked” ‘, (yes, religion + sex negative feminist domination is other factor too beside topless inequality).

So I hope my reader can help me raise awareness of ‘free the nipple’, by promoting this blog/ article to many people by sharing it (not only my blog, if there’s other who become topless equality activist- help & support them too by sharing their message), or if you dare join gotopless org. I’m sick whenever I told that “this festival have nudity unfairness”, most of people will not understand since there’s a biased on ‘toplessness’ on the first place. So Share to help more people get the ‘anatomy equality’ message, and optimistic in the future more & more people aware of equality (although long progress).

By the way penis=VAGINA, while your hairy chest=breast, share this meme too! because when we said topless equality some people still don’t get it, and they started again to comparing 1/2 naked female with full frontal naked men. Think for a while: they angry when we said topless equality (which mean both men & women can fairly see their opposite sexes top part equally in non sexual context at public), yet okay if comparing 1/2 naked female with full frontal naked men (which actually not fair since ‘only female get privilege to see her opposite sexes genital’).

DIFzbcFV0AEep1v

DIFzbcRVoAAy7uh

DIFzbUIVwAAXawd

In my observation double standard often more strong (& difficult to be criticize) if at Asia since majority of them have tradition mentality that ‘care female modesty yet ignored male modesty’ (yes in the past some Asia place still open to female nudity but I don’t know why nowadays female public nudity extinct, all suddenly become more prudish if it’s female, and so more & more double standard- only okay if it male nudity that been exposed at public/ if not: if they’re okay to female wear bikini somehow they have show were the men exposed his full buttcrack), while I more love Europe & Latin since they have nudity equality at public (or topless equality) in non sexual context & prove it possible.

Brit tv sky atlantic ama

I know above is from U.s or U.k film that unfairly only ‘objectified’ male genital yet protected female genital by merkin, but this just use by me as an illustration only of topless female.

DeKuZvlVMAEenly

Share, and support each other- you, the one who have passion in ‘anatomy equality’.

In the end of the day I just want equality: ‘why shy women get specialization to wear other custom than regulated custom at professional sport- but not if a shy guy?’, ‘why female labelled as “slut” for exposing skin yet men can get away with it?’, ‘why if you want modesty as your culture you only care female public modesty?’, ‘why you easily understand that “full naked female with topless men” is not equal comparison, but suddenly difficult to understand that “topless female is also unequal to be compared with full naked male?” ‘, ‘why you must hate female that body confidence at public? yet glorified male who body confidence?’, ‘why female can see most of male anatomy at public (Asia), yet male can only see female anatomy in porn + count as ‘sexist that objectified female’ if seeing female body at public’- it’s double standard, prejudice based by sexes (that already I debunk on many of my prev article, read) & equality is possible. Topless equality is benefit for both sexes.

 

Leave a comment »

Top 5 reason why ‘Free The Penis’= ‘FREE THE VAGINA’ (dick/ cock= VULVA/ PUSSY). While breast= Men Nipple (SAME ANATOMY).

  1. penis= VAGINA, both are PRIMARY reproduction, both between legs & infront asses, and both for PEEING. while breast are SECONDARY reproduction just like adam’s neck.
  2. How if it’s reverse? when men just half or semi naked, I ask female to show her vagina or full frontal naked? feminist (sex negative type) also disagree right? so don’t be hypocrite.
  3. How if I said “she saw our men butt then men must see her vagina, it’s fair since both private” you get my point? you see the fallacy comparison? same when mainstream compared (NON-GENITAL) breast with dick (male GENITAL).
  4. Isn’t funny if penis – male genital (which bigger than v) can be seen or not taboo? even if erect? yet female genital/ vagina which is smaller is taboo? that’s why to get rid this biased compared penis with VULVA, ok?
  5. What’s next if you said “men see breast or ‘women half naked bottom on’ then women must able to see men fully frontal naked or topless + bottomless”, if we follow this fail mindset then ‘what’s next?’ if female then bottomless equally like the men, what’s next? women must able to see men orgasm? or female can touch penis at public just because men see vagina at public? you understand now?

Female have privilege by the way, they can easily ask the wrong comparison like “if women semi naked then men must full frontal naked, equal!”, mainstream will just follow and listen sex negative feminist hypocrisy, while men have no privilege to said the reverse like that. This biased factor one of them is caused by ‘topless inequality’ so free the Nipple!

Free The Nipple 17d17

nip equal nip while penis equal VAGINA 17d17

This pic above is normal just like when clothed female selfie with topless guy, period. the premis should be “why women can see guy’s nipple- one side only? then men should able to see topless women too” << this is CORRECT. The wrong 1 if we started asking guy to fully naked just because female half naked. If you want guy show penis then show VAGINA too, to be equal right?

Naked equality free the vag 17d17 (1)

LEARN Asian! Learn sex negative HYPOCRITE feminist! Learn sexist religious people! Learn Mid East .. at least first learn hair will not make guy become animal rapist (except if you want to believe that).

Leave a comment »

Gotopless 2017 Celebration part 1: My addition message

Gotopless 2017 is over but it message is still celebrated-it give equality for both sexes:

For female- female have equal rights to choose topless at public in non sexual context if she confidence without being labelled like “whores” (especially when men topless the exact same thing all the time) + public breastfeeding.

For male- male will not curious about female top & we-male will be able to see & admired it in more natural way – in non sexual context – just like female admire shirtless hot guy (which I know some ‘cavemen’ & ‘sex negative feminist’ will unhappy by this fair idea). if it normalize we-male do can accustomed by it just like Europe guy (especially if female already free to see & admire shirtless male all the time too-until bored).

We also learn Vagina=Penis because both are primary reproduction, both is genital, and both between leg. While breast is equal to your hairy chest-hypocrite (both have nipple).

It possible like some Europe already show you, maybe not all Europe but if there’s some place that show it possible=it possible-now depend on our society mindset.

Gotopless 17 wp1 8917 (1)

Gotopless 17 wp1 8917 (2)

Gotopless 17 wp1 8917 (3)

Gotopless 17 wp1 8917 (4)

Gotopless 17 wp1 8917 (6)

Leave a comment »

Hejab or Burqa = More Fanatic Form of Sex Negative Feminist

I know this topic is scandalizes as it sound, and probably my pro free the nipple friend upset why I wrote like this (because I know somehow even if you support free the nipple, you support muslim at the same time). I want to point out from male perspective how hejab is unfair to men too, give you insight why half population still believe it’s “womenrights”, and why this is not about banning rights to wear. I know it unfair to women side too-which I often hear from sex positive feminist, and I’m not denying- that just want to add from other perspective. So please let me talk openly in here. I just want to be myself, and speak what I thought important (and since this topic is not mainstream, I’m PROUD to be the first who point out this).

Before start I understand also about how men-who-pro-hijab-mentality act, this men forced women what to wear-I get it, and also they “help” to create culture that unfair to men too actually.

Do you ever wonder why even after Westerner Atheist point out why “Muslim holy book” is not compatible for women rights, it’s look like the argument didn’t affect them? there’s still numerous of women come to Islam (beside their born there)? why is it there’s even many women claim it’s for women rights? I will not said my background but I know very well what ladies-pro-hijab mentality look like. So by just saying “women must covered is misogyny”, is not enough (maybe only Westerner that get it but not hejab girl (hejabi) itself). you must understand how hijab girl perceived (I’m not said I know everything but pretty sure this speculation is mostly true-I have observed it for long time).

It is because pro hejab girl, or muslim women itself have a mentality of sex-negative-feminist. Basically think female bodies have more “dignity” than male bodies, dislike men can see women bodies at public-perceived it degrading (more worse every skin of female bodies want to be considered “inappropriate” if men see it), yet at the same time dislike if she get the equal reverse situation treatment (dislike if women prohibited seeing male bodies at public or if it count as inappropriate). So “Muslim holy book” is very compatible with them (even in Quran the double standard dresscode is more contrast) so they see this as an advantage for women. They more think it’s “good” since the double standard ideology is easy to considered normal in the name of religion- like in Middle East society (they like this), and this is religion so it will make people afraid to questioned it, and also the cumpolsary in Islam to spread their believe (syari’a) include this unfair dresscode rule (which make more easy to spread this hejabi believe) this explain why this typical women view this as “womensrights”. In addition this mentality is brought to sex also where usually most of the time it’s male bodies more exploited while female one more less exploited like: the hijabi can have their sex fantasy exploiting male anatomy until the maximum one (blowjob brutal cum fantasy-tasting with mouth) while the men (lesser exploiting her) even just touching her still lesser than when this hijabi taste him + often she full clothes (Hijab / Burqa) after hijabi get her fantasy of exploiting men while her “dignity” is “protected”, mainstream still said they “sacrifice” for men (what a Bullshit) but hejabi like it. and in their sex culture mostly status quo like this. They love this “dignity win” concept & they think they-female Win, that’s the reason they try to spread their believe to create ‘Its only objectification/ sexism if Men see/ touch it’ culture because they think all women win if like that- Like sex-negative-feminist but the more hardcore one. This is the only one that they really concerned that’s the reason they don’t care about 9 years old girl married, don’t care of honor killing for women, don’t care when women must sit behind men, don’t care when other women get acid in her face, don’t care four wives, and don’t care female genital mutilation (banned male genital mutilation too by the way) etc.

I disagree when this hardcore muslimah (female) try to forced their rule, and believe to everybody- especially when it’s about: men seeing female hair or leg at public is considered “porn”, “objectification”, & “degrade” women, even if it just at public beach (not even her husband can see it), while women okay to see men with underwear at beach (even if it not her husband), this is not a great equality I think. They tend & bold to complaining even for smallest little thing to public mainstream like demanding women who already full clothes to wear more wider clothes because they hate that men can still see women curved (yet silence when in same society men peeing uncovered at public-which is more worse). After this so called “good muslimah girl” watching Magic Mike at movie (looking at hot shirtless men) they come out to complain about “how only women are objectified, and degraded”, again mainstream just easily listen to them because of what’s called political correctness especially in the name of religion + sex negative feminist…

Yup, I know there’s sex positive women who think that if women must covered at public, and never get oral pleasure is unfair too-I understand that. I wrote this specifically to pro hejab girl, and sex negative feminist … believe me this kind of people will easily understand when I wrote like this, maybe Europe people difficult to get it since by default they never experience this + already open to nudity (so couldn’t see from this perception).

Last, I understand that their “holy book” have unfairness towards female side too which already speak often, and often again, I not denying that but nether less I want people to understand from my point of view too-that unfairness happen to both sexes in Quran, and I point out how it unfair from men perspective especially from my personal view. I support women’s rights what to wear or not to wear at public (what I mentioned is the double standard apply by mainstream which create unfairness in most middle east), and ideology of ‘unfair dresscode were everybody must submit’ is different from female rights to wear, please differentiate that. I didn’t want to against Muslim or something like that- this just point out the reason what I disagree on Mid-East culture, and it’s my rights to exercise my freedom of speech.

Hijab turkey 24417 wp

Hejab Sexist to both Sexes 25a17

 

 

2 Comments »

Should labels of Kafir or Murtad be deemed Hate Speech?, 9 December 2014

Worthy talk by Maryam Namazie about freespeech, 30 minute but you can enjoy the discussion while relaxing & drink tea 🙂

Leave a comment »